2. Methodological quality.
Study | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Total |
Aigne 2006 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Bonk 2000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Borchgrevink 1998 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Brison 2006 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Bunketorp 2006 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Crawford 2004 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Ferrari 2005 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
Fialka 1989 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Fitz‐Ritson 1995 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Florio 1999 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Foley‐Nolan 1992 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Hendriks 1996 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
McKinney 1989 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Mealy 1986 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Oliveira 2006 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Pennie 1990 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Provinciali 1996 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Rosenfeld 2000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Schnabel 2004 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Scholten‐Peeters 2006 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Söderlund 2000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Söderlund 2001a | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Thuile 2002 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |