Skip to main content
letter
. 2021 Sep 10;32(1):e13020. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13020

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Unsupervised t‐SNE analysis with an overlay on the known ependymal tumor clusters from DKFZ data shows our SP‐EPN–ZFTA (SNUH: presenting case) is belong to the clusters of ST‐EPN–ZFTA fusion‐positive, but apart from the clusters of the SP‐EPN. MPE, myxopapillary ependymoma; PFA‐EPN, posterior fossa group A ependymoma; PFB‐EPN, posterior fossa group B ependymoma; PF‐SUBEPN, posterior fossa‐subependymoma; PN, ependymoma; SP‐EPN, spinal‐ependymoma; SP‐SUBEPN, spinal subependymoma; ST‐EPN‐ZFTA, supratentorial‐ependymoma ZFTA fusion‐positive; ST‐SUBEPN, supratentorial subependymoma; YAP1‐EPN, ST‐ependymoma YAP1‐positive