Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan;112(1):135–143. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306498

TABLE 3—

Associations of Patient and Clinic Characteristics and Receipt of Chlamydia Screening Accounting for Race of Patients for Each Clinician, by Well Visits: Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 2015–2019

Characteristics of Well Visits AOR (95% CI)
Patient characteristics
Race/ethnicity
Black racea 1.88 (1.65, 2.15)
Other race 1.26 (1.08, 1.46)
Latinx ethnicity 1.18 (0.97, 1.42)
Age, y 1.36 (1.31, 1.41)
Insurance
 Public (Ref) 1
 Private 0.79 (0.72, 0.87)
Previous chlamydia screening 8.17 (7.29, 9.16)
Previous chlamydia infection 6.48 (4.46, 9.40)
Clinician characteristics
Proportion of Black patients per cliniciana 11.95 (6.85, 20.87)
Clinician type
 General pediatrics attending physician (Ref) 1
 Nurse practitioner 1.48 (1.33, 1.65)
 Adolescent medicine specialist (attending physician/fellow) 1.93 (1.61, 2.31)
Clinician’s years in practice
 ≥ 15 y (Ref) 1
 < 3 y 1.49 (1.29, 1.71)
 3–14 y 1.39 (0.26, 1.53)
Clinic characteristics
Clinic size
 < 10 clinicians (Ref) 1
 10–20 clinicians 1.58 (0.53, 4.69)
 ≥ 20 clinicians 10.72 (0.53, 216.99)
Clinic type and geography
 Suburban (Ref) 1
 Urban Title X 0.88 (0.03, 28.78)
 Urban non-Title X 2.96 (0.59, 14.80)

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. The sample size was n = 63 221 individuals.

a

The difference between individual patients’ race (race: 0 = non-Black vs 1 = Black) and the composition of Black vs non-Black patients in encounter-level data (mblack) represented the estimated effect of the clinician’s implicit bias on the odds that the clinician ordered chlamydia screening (Black = race-mblack).