TABLE 2.
Rationale for novel drug and oncologist prescribing patterns for the 133 novel drugs prescribed in this study
Novel drug rationale (N = 133) | N (%) |
---|---|
Genomic result | 44 (33.1) |
Unclear | 23 (17.3) |
Conventional treatment failure | 18 (13.5) |
External opinion | 10 (7.5) |
Acute deterioration | 7 (5.3) |
Evidence cited | 7 (5.3) |
Pharmacological therapy preferred | 4 (3.0) |
Ineligible for clinical trial | 4 (3.0) |
Parental choice | 3 (2.3) |
Prior clinical use | 3 (2.3) |
Combination to prevent resistance | 2 (1.5) |
Steroid sparing therapy | 2 (1.5) |
CAR‐T Cell Anergy | 1 (0.8) |
Treatment continuation | 1 (0.8) |
Required treatment intensification | 1 (0.8) |
Loss of major molecular response post transplant | 1 (0.8) |
Radiation necrosis | 1 (0.8) |
Recommended for Bleeding Syrinx | 1 (0.8) |
Prescribing oncologist (Employment status, Specialization) | N (% per oncologist) |
---|---|
Oncologist 1 (Full‐time, brain and solid tumors) | 38 (28.6) |
Oncologist 2 (Full‐time, brain and solid tumors) | 18 (13.5) |
Oncologist 3 (Full‐time, brain and solid tumors) | 15 (11.3) |
Oncologist 4 (Full‐time, brain and solid tumors) | 14 (10.5) |
Oncologist 5 (Full‐time, hematological malignancies) | 9 (6.8) |
Oncologist 6 (Part‐time, solid tumors) | 6 (4.5) |
Oncologist 7 (Full‐time, hematological malignancies) | 6 (4.5) |
Oncologist 8 – 17 b | <5 a (<3.8) |
Twenty seven drugs prescribed in total.
Oncologists 8‐17 included five full‐time and five part‐time oncologists; seven who specialize in brain and solid tumors and three who specialize in hematological malignancies.