Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;11(4):847–858. doi: 10.3390/nursrep11040079

Table 3.

Means, Standard Deviations, and Pearson Correlations of Proposed Antecedents of Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction.

Pearson’s r
Variable M SD Range Compassion
Fatigue
Compassion
Satisfaction
Supervisor Support 10.36 3.10 2–16 −0.30 * 0.33 *
Coworker Support 12.39 2.11 2–16 −0.26 * 0.31 *
Psych job demands 23.69 3.59 8–34 0.22 * −0.25 *
Decision latitude 72.48 10.04 32–96 −0.22 * 0.40 *
Total Emotional Intelligence 124.56 13.16 36–163 −0.20 * 0.43 *
Perceptions of Emotions 37.80 4.88 9–50 −0.05 0.19 *
Managing Own Emotions 34.26 4.76 14–45 −0.36 * 0.52 *
Managing others’ emotions 29.79 3.81 8–40 −0.14 * 0.37 *
Utilizations of emotions 22.66 3.15 4–30 −0.06 0.26 *
Compassion Fatigue 26.75 7.10 11–46 −0.48 *
Compassion Satisfaction 25.16 6.15 10–36 −0.48 *

Notes: * indicates that the correlation is significant, p < 0.05; Out of range lower-bound scores are due to non-response.