Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 29;21:669. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01976-4

Table 2.

Oral health status among the CD and control groups (percentage distribution)

Variables Celiac N = 104 Control N = 104 P value OR (95% CI)
n (%)
RAS
 Yes 44 (42.3) 16 (15.4) < 0.001* 4.03 (2.09–7.81)
 No 60 (57.7) 88 (84.6) Ref
DED
 Yes 73 (70.2) 36 (34.6) < 0.001* 4.45 (2.48–7.97)
 No 31 (29.8) 68 (65.4) Ref
 DED Grade I 51 (49.0) 23 (22.1) < 0.001** 3.39 (1.86–6.19)
 DED Grade II 18 (17.3) 11 (10.6) 1.77 (0.79–3.60)
 DED > Grade II 4 (3.8) 2 (1.9) 2.04 (0.37–11.39)
Dental caries experience
 Yes 89 (85.6%) 98 (94.2%) 0.038* 0.36 (0.14–0.98)
 No 15 (14.4%) 6 (5.8%) Ref
Malocclusion⁂
 No/mild 21 (21.4%) 23 (23.5%) 0.732 0.89 (0.45–1.74)
 Defined 28 (28.6%) 29 (29.6%) 0.875 0.95 (0.51–1.76)
 Severe 24 (24.5%) 21 (21.4%) 0.610 1.19 (0.61–2.32)
 Very severe 25 (25.5%) 25 (25.5%) 1.00 1.00 (0.53–1.90)
 Deep bite 13 (13.3%) 13 (13.3%) 1.00 1.00 (0.44–2.28)
 Posterior cross bite 13 (13.3%) 8 (8.2%) 0.248 1.72 (0.68–4.36)

Bold values indicate significant levels of P values/OR (95% CI)

N total number of participants, n number of participants in each group, CD celiac disease, OR odds ratio, DED Grade I defect in enamel color, such as cream or brown opacity, well defined or diffused, Grade II slight defect in enamel structure as "horizontal grooves or shallow pits.”, Grade III evident defect in enamel structure as "deep horizontal grooves or large opacities of different colors.”, Grade IV severe form of defect in enamel structure as "the shape of the tooth is altered, with pointed cusps.”, DMFT/dmft decayed, missed, filled permanent/primary teeth

Chi-squared test

Fisher’s exact test was used when the number of participants is less than 5

*P value < 0.05 using chi-squared test

**P value < 0.05 using Fisher’s exact test

⁂Patients with only primary teeth were not assessed