Table 1. A comparison between photon-based techniques and proton-based techniques.
Photon-based techniques | Particle-based techniques | |
---|---|---|
Technique | Involves firing beams multiple times from different angles | Uses particle accelerators to form a single beam of high-energy protons [44] |
| ||
Mechanism | Radiation delivered from an external source; dose decreases for deeper tissues | Distribution follows a Bragg-peak: Low doses delivered on entering target tissues with a steep maximum at a specific energy-dependent depth [44] |
| ||
Delivery methods | 2DCRT, 3DCRT, IMRT | Via heavy particles; Involves Passive scattering, uniform scanning, active scanning [46] |
| ||
Comparison | Poorer OS | Better OS [54] |
| ||
Less localized radiation exposure® lower doses delivered, more collateral damage | More localized particle exposure® higher doses delivered, less collateral damage [45] | |
| ||
Poorer dose distribution | Better dose distribution due to narrow Bragg-peak range [44] | |
| ||
Poorer energy distribution | Better energy distribution (via higher linear-energy transfer) | |
| ||
The exponential decrease in radiation as depth increase | Uniform coverage at all depths | |
| ||
DNA damage may be reparable | Induce irreparable damage to DNA | |
| ||
More dependent on oxygen availability ® hypoxic tumors show poorer response | Less dependent on the oxygen availability of tumor tissue® hypoxic tumors show better response [45] |
2DCRT: Two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy; 3DCRT: Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; IMRT: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; OS: Overall survival; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid