Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 6;7(6):811–833.

Table 1. A comparison between photon-based techniques and proton-based techniques.

Photon-based techniques Particle-based techniques
Technique Involves firing beams multiple times from different angles Uses particle accelerators to form a single beam of high-energy protons [44]

Mechanism Radiation delivered from an external source; dose decreases for deeper tissues Distribution follows a Bragg-peak: Low doses delivered on entering target tissues with a steep maximum at a specific energy-dependent depth [44]

Delivery methods 2DCRT, 3DCRT, IMRT Via heavy particles; Involves Passive scattering, uniform scanning, active scanning [46]

Comparison Poorer OS Better OS [54]

Less localized radiation exposure® lower doses delivered, more collateral damage More localized particle exposure® higher doses delivered, less collateral damage [45]

Poorer dose distribution Better dose distribution due to narrow Bragg-peak range [44]

Poorer energy distribution Better energy distribution (via higher linear-energy transfer)

The exponential decrease in radiation as depth increase Uniform coverage at all depths

DNA damage may be reparable Induce irreparable damage to DNA

More dependent on oxygen availability ® hypoxic tumors show poorer response Less dependent on the oxygen availability of tumor tissue® hypoxic tumors show better response [45]

2DCRT: Two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy; 3DCRT: Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; IMRT: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; OS: Overall survival; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid