Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 16;11:802592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.802592

Table 2.

Summary of recent meta-analysis of neuraxial anaesthesia and cancer recurrence.

Author Year Regional anaesthesia Total Number of studies analysed Findings
Lee et al. (65) 2020 Epidural and paravertebral anaesthesia 6 (3,139 patients in the regional anaesthesia group) Adjunctive use of epidural or paravertebral anaesthesia with general anaesthesia did not reduce the rate of cancer recurrence following cancer surgery.
Weng et al. (61) 2016 Epidural and Spinal anaesthesia 20 (15,160 patients in regional anaesthesia group) Neuraxial anaesthesia appears to improve overall survival, specifically in colorectal cancer surgery and may be associated with reduced risk of cancer recurrence.
Sun et al. (62) 2015 Epidural and Spinal anaesthesia 20 (16,618 patients in regional anaesthesia group) Perioperative neuraxial anaesthesia may improve overall survival after cancer surgery but it had no positive influence in the reduction of cancer recurrence.
Lee et al. (64) 2015 Epidural and Spinal anaesthesia 10 (7,504 patients in regional anaesthesia group) Neuraxial anaesthesia during prostate cancer surgery appears to improve overall survival but was not associated with longer recurrence-free-survival.
Pej et al. (63) 2014 Epidural anaesthesia 10 (3,254 patients in regional anaesthesia group) Perioperative epidural anaesthesia did not influence postoperative cancer recurrence and metastasis rate. However, epidural anaesthesia may be associated with improvement in prognosis of prostate cancer surgery with a follow-up of less than or equal to two years.