TABLE 2.

Statistical comparison of network activity.

Firing rate	Uninhibited	Inhibited	Uninhibited
pre-hypoxia	normoxic	normoxic	hypoxic
Uninhibited normoxic
Inhibited normoxic	0,53
Uninhibited hypoxic	0,31	0,89
Inhibited hypoxic	0,019	0,14	0,030
Burst propensity	Uninhibited	Inhibited	Uninhibited
pre-hypoxia	normoxic	normoxic	hypoxic
Uninhibited normoxic
Inhibited normoxic	0,22
Uninhibited hypoxic	0,53	0,053
Inhibited hypoxic	0,34	0,52	0,026
Synchrony	Uninhibited	Inhibited	Uninhibited
pre-hypoxia	normoxic	normoxic	hypoxic
Uninhibited normoxic
Inhibited normoxic	0,81
Uninhibited hypoxic	0,87	0,78
Inhibited hypoxic	0,12	0,44	0,053
Firing rate	Uninhibited	Inhibited	Uninhibited
post-hypoxia	normoxic	normoxic	hypoxic
Uninhibited normoxic
Inhibited normoxic	0,13
Uninhibited hypoxic	8,73⋅10–05	5,55⋅10–05
Inhibited hypoxic	8,73⋅10–05	5,55⋅10–05	0,19
Burst propensity	Uninhibited	Inhibited	Uninhibited
post-hypoxia	normoxic	normoxic	hypoxic
Uninhibited normoxic
Inhibited normoxic	0,81
Uninhibited hypoxic	0,0051	0,00040
Inhibited hypoxic	0,044	0,013	0,0073
Synchrony	Uninhibited	Inhibited	Uninhibited
post-hypoxia	normoxic	normoxic	hypoxic
Uninhibited normoxic
Inhibited normoxic	0,22
Uninhibited hypoxic	8,73⋅10–05	9.30⋅10–05
Inhibited hypoxic	8,73⋅10–05	0,00080	0,069

Statistical comparisons were performed on the relative dispersion of network parameters for each network before and after the hypoxic challenge or normoxic control, comparing the different groups by Wilcoxon rank sum test. With Bonferroni correction, differences were considered significant at p < 0.0083.