TABLE 3.

Comparison of this model's diffusion coefficients and literature values

Year	Author	Model	IVD region	D g (m2/s)	D l (m2/s)	D o (m2/s)
This model			CEP	6.73E−11	1.50E−10	7.96E−10
			AF	9.08E−11	2.02E−10	1.07E−09
			NP	1.22E−10 to 2.54E−10	1.83E−10 to 3.81E−10	3.90E−10 to 8.13E−10
2016[30]	Cisewski	FE model	CEP	2.68E−11	4.52E−11	—
2016[30	Wu	Human ex vivo	CEP	2.68E−11	4.52E−11	—
2012[61]	Jackson	Human in vitro	AF	3.56E−11 to 8.71E−11	—	1.13E−10 to 1.85E−9
2009[62]	Jackson	Bovine in vitro	AF	—	—	1.56E−09
2008[63]	Jackson	Bovine in vitro	AF	1.38E−10 to 9.17E−11	—	—
2009[64]	Magnier	FE model	CEP	9.17E−10	1.39E−09	3.00E−09
2007[42]	Soukane	FE model	CEP	2.11E−10	3.14E−10	7.81E−10
			AF	2.85E−10	4.24E−10	1.05E−09
			NP	3.78E−10	5.61E−10	1.39E−09
1975[49]	Maroudas	Human in vitro	CEP	2.43E−10	—	—
			AF	2.50E−10	—	—
2003[65]	Sélard	FE model	AF	2.50E−10	4.86E−10	8.33E−10
			NP	3.75E−10	6.11E−10	1.28E−09

Note: Diffusion coefficients of glucose, oxygen, and lactate used in this model were compared with their corresponding values reported in the literature. This model's coefficients, which were extracted from ADC maps and multiplied by scaling factors, fell within the range of diffusion coefficients reported in the literature. The range of diffusion coefficients used in the NP for this model depicted the highest and lowest values obtained from the ADC maps.