Table 1.
The summary of the top-down method for the fabrication of 2D MOXs
Synthesis methods | Advantages | Limitations | Materials | Thickness (nm) | Applications | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical exfoliation | Simple High quality |
Low yield | h-TiO2 | 0.55 | Electronic device | (Zhang et al., 2021a) |
Ultrasonic-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation | Simple Economical Scalable |
Poor controllability | Ga2O3 | 6 | Photocatalyst | (Syed et al., 2017) |
MoO3 | 3–4 | Supercapacitor | (Hanlon et al., 2014) | |||
V2O5 | 2.1–3.8 | Lithium storage | (Zhang et al., 2017) | |||
Cleavage plane-oriented exfoliation | Simple Economical |
Poor scalability | TiO2 | 0.41 | – | (Liu et al., 2019) |
SC-CO2-assisted exfoliation | Amorphous structure | High cost | VO2 | – | – | (Zhang et al., 2021b) |
Soft chemical exfoliation | Simple Moderate |
Low efficiency High cost |
MoO3 | 5 | Supercapacitors | (Sricharan et al., 2020) |
Electrochemical exfoliation | Eco-friendly Efficiency High yield |
Poor scalability | MnO2 | 0.73 | Zinc-ion batteries | (Yang et al., 2021) |
ZnO | 1 | Gas sensor | (Hou et al., 2017) |