. 2021 Dec 21;53:101054. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101054

Table 7.

Results from mixed effects models predicting EWEFS performance by CBCL syndrome scales. RT = reaction time; Prob. = problems; Com. = complaints; Anx./Dep. = anxious/depressed; SE = standard error; * indicate if effect was significant at Bonferroni-corrected alpha of .001. All betas are standardized.

	Congruent trials		Interference effect		Happy – angry faces
	Accuracy	RT	Accuracy	RT	Accuracy	RT
CBCL subscale	$β$ (SE)^{Bonf. sig.}	$β$ (SE)^{Bonf. sig.}	$β$ (SE)^{Bonf. sig.}	$β$ (SE)^{Bonf. sig.}	$β$ (SE)^{Bonf. sig.}	$β$ (SE)^{Bonf. sig.}
Internalizing/externalizing models
Internalizing	-0.005(0.013)	.036(0.012)	.007(0.012)	.005(0.012)	.020(0.012)	-0.026(0.012)
Externalizing	-0.107(0.013)*	-0.012(0.012)	-0.067(0.012)*	.013(0.012)	-0.015(0.012)	.005(0.012)
Non-composite syndrome scales models
Aggressive	-0.060(0.017)*	-0.025(0.015)	-0.011(0.016)	-0.006(0.016)	.028(0.016)	.005(0.016)
Rule Breaking	.046(0.016)	-0.022(0.014)	-0.025(0.014)	.023(0.015)	-0.026(0.015)	.025(0.015)
Attention Prob.	-0.148(0.015)*	.117(0.013)*	-0.043(0.014)	-0.003(0.014)	-0.027(0.014)	-0.042(0.014)
Thought Prob.	.040(0.015)	-0.047(0.014)*	.037(0.014)	-0.010(0.014)	.020(0.014)	.011(0.014)
Social Prob.	-0.070(0.016)*	.073(0.015)*	-0.057(0.015)*	.002(0.015)	-0.016(0.015)	.009(0.015)
Somatic Com.	.011(0.013)	-0.003(0.010)	-0.019(0.011)	.020(0.011)	-0.000(0.011)	-0.009(0.011)
Withdrawn	.043(0.013)	-0.020(0.012)	.023(0.013)	-0.005(0.013)	.027(0.013)	-0.030(0.013)
Anx./Dep.	-.001(0.015)	-0.020(0.013)	.022(0.014)	.000(0.014)	-0.004(0.014)	.006(0.014)