Table 2.

Characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for inguinal endometriosis

Case	Age (yr)	EM history	Parity	Surgery year	Laterality	ICS	Preoperative diagnosis	US/MRI	Site of EM	Surgery	Postoperative diagnosis	Follow-up (mo)
1	47	-	P	2018	R	-	IH/cyst of Nuck’s canal?	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	24
2	52	+	P	2016	R	-	IH/IEM?	US: Low echo with cluster; Cysts (IEM); MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	41
3	33	-	P	2017	R	+	IH/cyst of Nuck’s canal?	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	24
4	53	-	P	2018	R	+	IH	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	12
5	35	+	N	2018	R	-	IH	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	19
6	36	+	N	2019	R	-	IH	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	13
7	42	-	P	2015	R	+	IH	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (R); IH (R)	60
8	40	+	N	2012	L	-	IH	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI:/	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion; Hernia repair	IEM (L); IH (L)	70
9	32	-	N	2014	R	+	IEM; Pelvic EM	US: Hetero-geneous echo; MRI: IEM (R)	Extraperitoneal round ligament	Wide excision of the lesion	IEM (R); Pelvic EM	88
10	36	-	P	2011	B	+	Bilateral IEM; IH (R)	US: Hetero-geneous echo (L) + cyst (R); MRI: IEM (bi)	Extraperitoneal round ligament (L); Hernial sac (R)	Wide excision of the lesion (L + R); Hernia repair (R)	IEM + IH (R); IEM (L)	97

ICS: Inguinal catamenial symptom; IH: Inguinal hernia; IEM: Inguinal endometriosis; N: Nulliparous; P: Parous; US: Ultrasonography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; EM: Endometriosis.