Table 1.

Safe assessment case 1

Esthetics		Occlusion (static and functional)		Structure				Biology
Face: frontal view		Sagittal		Status of teeth and restorations				Oral health
Lower facial height	Normal	Overjet	2 mm	18		38		Oral Hygiene	Excellent
Upper midline to facial	Coincident	Incisor Classification	Class I	17		37		Phenotype	Thick
Lower midline to facial	Coincidetn	Molar relationship (rx—subdivision)	Class I—Full	16		36
Chin point to facial	Coincident	Molar relationship (sx—subdivision)	Class I—Full	15		35
Face: Profile view		Canine relationship (rx—subdivision)	Class I—Full	14		34
Skeletal (severity)	Mild Class III	Canine relationship (sx—subdivision)	Class I—Full	13		33
Smile: analysis		Vertical		12		32
Smile line	Ideal	Overbite (%)	Decreased 20%	11		31
Smile arc	Curved	Openbite	–	21	F	41
Buccal corridors	Normal	Transverse		22		42
Soft tissue		Crossbite	Yes—12	23		43
Lip competence	Competent	Displacement	–	24		44
Lip catch	Not present	Scissor Bite	–	25		45
Naso-labial angle	Normal	Space analysis		26		46
Notes on esthetics: The main concern of the patient is tooth 1.2 and diastema between tooth 2.3 and 2.4		Crowding upper	Mild (0-4 mm)	27		47
		Crowding lower	Moderate (4–8 mm)	28		48
		Spacing Upper	–	Treatment goals: Esthetics: Function: correction of crossbite tooth 1.2, correction of crowding lower arch Dentition: Restoring 2.1 Biology: no changes needed
		Spacing Lower	–
		Arch form
		Upper	U shape
		Lower	U shape
		Occlusal scheme
		Lateral excursion right	Canine
		Lateral excursion left	Canine
		Protrusive excursion	Incisor
		Tmd examination
		Pain on palpation	No
		Clicks	No
		Crepitus	No
		Mouth opening	Regular

Structure, legend: O = Restoration, X = Missing, A = Abraded, C = CARIES, F = fractured, R = Root filled, P = Perio involved