Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 29;21:671. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02034-9

Table 2.

Safe assessment case 2

Esthetics Occlusion
(Static and Functional)
Structure Biology
Face: frontal view Sagittal Status of teeth and restorations Oral health
Lower facial height Normal Overjet 0 mm 18 38 Oral Hygiene Excellent
Upper midline to facial Coincident Incisor Classification Class I 17 37 Phenotype Thick
Lower midline to facial Coincident Molar relationship (rx—subdivision) Class I—Full 16 36
Chin point to facial Deviated Molar relationship (sx- subdivision) Class I—Full 15 35
Face: Profile view Canine relationship (rx—subdivision) Class I—Full 14 34
Skeletal (severity) Class I Canine relationship (sx—subdivision) Class I—Full 13 33
Smile: analysis Vertical 12 32
Smile line Ideal Overbite (%) 15% 11 31
Smile arc Curved Openbite 21 41
Buccal corridors Normal Transverse 22 42
Soft tissue Crossbite 1.3/4.3 23 43
Lip competence Competent Displacement 24 44
Lip catch Not present Scissor Bite 25 45
Naso-labial angle Normal Space Analysis 26 46

Notes on esthetics:

The main concerns of the patient are teeth 1.3 and 4.3 in cross-bite, and tooth 1.2 that is conoid

Crowding upper Mild (0-4 mm) 27 47
Crowding lower Mild (0-4 mm) 28 48
Spacing Upper

Treatment Goals:

Esthetics: create space for the restoration of 1.2

Function: correction of crossbite teeth 1.3/4.3, correction of lower arch crowding

Dentition: Restoring 1.2

Biology: no changes needed

Spacing Lower
Arch Form
Upper U shape
Lower U shape
Occlusal Scheme
Lateral excursion right Canine
Lateral excursion left Canine
Protrusive excursion Incisor
Tmd Examination
Pain on palpation No
Clicks No
Crepitus No
Mouth opening Regular

Structure, legend: O = Restoration, X = Missing, A = Abraded, C = Caries, F = Fractured, R = Root filled, P = Perio involved