Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;12(6):1466–1476. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12761

Table 3.

Thresholds and sensitivity analysis

Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio HR (95% CI) a P‐value HR (95% CI) a P‐value
Reference cut‐off points for cancer patients
Thresholds
<3 Ref
≥3 1.49 (1.31–1.69) <0.001
Thresholds
<3 Ref
3–5 1.38 (1.20–1.60) < 0.001
≥5 1.63 (1.40–1.89) < 0.001
P for trend < 0.001
Thresholds effect analysis
≥5 (as continuous, per SD) 1.12 (1.01–1.25) 0.035
Sensitive analysis Excluding patients dying within 6 months Without myelosuppression
As continuous (per SD) 1.15 (1.06–1.25) 0.001 1.22 (1.14–1.30) <0.001
By NLR cut‐off
Low (<3.5) Ref Ref
High (≥3.5) 1.38 (1.18–1.62) <0.001 1.46 (1.27–1.68) <0.001
Interquartile
Q1 (<1.83) Ref Ref
Q2 (1.83–2.95) 1.45 (1.15–1.81) 0.001 1.33 (1.08–1.65) 0.008
Q3 (2.95–4.80) 1.63 (1.29–2.05) <0.001 1.58 (1.28–1.95) <0.001
Q4 (≥4.80) 1.77 (1.38–2.27) <0.001 1.91 (1.53–2.39) <0.001
P for trend <0.001 <0.001

BMI, body mass index; EORTC QLQ‐C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C‐30; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status.

a

The model was adjusted for gender, age, BMI, tumour type, TNM stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, KPS score, albumin level, total bilirubin level, red blood cell count, platelet count, hand grip strength, reported reduced food intake, reported anorexia and EORTC QLQ‐C30 score.