Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 27;9(2):e002352. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002352

Table 3.

HRs with 95% CIs and p values of Cox proportional hazards regression models for sulfonylurea versus other OHAs

Model type Outcomes
All-cause mortality Cardiovascular events Major hypoglycemic episodes
HR
(95% CI)
P value HR
(95% CI)
P values HR
(95% CI)
P values
Unadjusted 2.23
(1.65 to 3.03)
<0.001 1.29
(1.02 to 1.63)
0.031 4.72
(2.43 to 9.15)
<0.001
IPTW 1.44
(1.12 to 1.84)
0.005 0.99
(0.81 to 1.22)
0.92 2.78
(1.66 to 4.66)
<0.001
Propensity matched 2.25
(1.39 to 3.64)
<0.001 0.78
(0.52 to 1.19)
0.25 3.50
(1.15 to 10.63)
0.027
IPTW (no censoring for insulin or additional OHAs) 1.35
(1.03 to 1.77)
0.028 1.00
(0.79 to 1.26)
1.00 2.88
(1.62 to 5.10)
<0.001
IPTW (censoring after 30-day grace period) 1.73
(1.26 to 2.34)
<0.001 1.11
(0.86 to 1.42)
0.42 3.75
(1.90 to 7.39)
<0.001
Stratified by era using IPTW
Sulfonylurea versus pre-2008 OHAs 0.87
(0.66 to 1.15)
0.32 0.74
(0.57 to 0.95)
0.019
Sulfonylurea versus post-2008 OHAs 3.33
(2.02 to 5.49)
<0.001 1.40
(1.01 to 1.93)
0.041

IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weight; OHA, oral antihyperglycemic agent.