Table 1.
Number of reviews (%) N=150 |
|
Journal | |
General nutrition journal (journals with only a nutrition focus) (eg, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition) | 61 (40.7%) |
Specialised nutrition journal (journals with a focus on nutrition and a specific disease area) (eg, Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases) | 7 (4.7%) |
General medical journal (eg, Lancet) | 28 (18.7%) |
Specialised medical journal (eg, Clinical Breast Cancer) | 54 (36%) |
Country of corresponding author’s affiliation | |
North America | 14 (9.3%) |
Europe | 43 (28.7%) |
Oceania | 13 (8.7%) |
Middle East | 28 (18.7%) |
Asia | 49 (32.7%) |
South America | 3 (0.7%) |
Was the review conducted to inform a particular guideline or policy decision or to fulfil the needs of a particular evidence user? | |
Yes | 6 (4%) |
No | 144 (96%) |
Funding* | |
Government support | 56 (37.3%) |
Institutional support | 34 (22.7%) |
Private not-for-profit foundation | 20 (13.3%) |
Food marketing/advocacy organisations | 4 (3.3%) |
Food companies | 2 (1.3%) |
No funding | 32 (21.3%) |
Not reported | 34 (22.7%) |
Did the authors declare any conflicts of interest? | |
Yes | 10 (6.7%) |
No | 135 (90%) |
Not reported | 5 (3.3%) |
Exposure(s)* | |
Micronutrient | 27 (18%) |
Macronutrient | 24 (16%) |
Bioactive compounds | 15 (10%) |
Food or beverage | 60 (40%) |
Food group | 21 (14.0%) |
Dietary pattern | 49 (32.7%) |
Non-nutritive components of foods/beverages | 25 (18.7%) |
Outcome(s)* | |
Cardiometabolic morbidity or mortality | 26 (17.3%) |
Cancer morbidity or mortality | 54 (36%) |
Diseases of the digestive system | 10 (6.7%) |
All-cause mortality | 9 (6%) |
Anthropometric measures | 8 (5.33%) |
Surrogate outcomes | 17 (11.3%) |
Other | 55 (36.7%) |
Eligible study designs* | |
Cohort | 146 (97.3%) |
Case-control | 97 (64.7%) |
Cross-sectional | 80 (53.3%) |
Randomised controlled trials | 74 (49.3%) |
Median no of primary studies (IQR) | 15 (11 to 23) |
Median no of participants (IQR) | 208 117 (84 951 to 510 954) |
Method for the synthesis of results | |
Meta-analysis | 115 (76.7%) |
Narrative | 21 (14%) |
Tabular/graphical summary of quantitative results without meta-analysis | 14 (9.3%) |
Did the review assess risk of bias? | |
Yes | 131 (87.3%) |
No | 19 (12.6%) |
*Each review can be classified in more than one category.