Table 3.
Tool | Confounding | Bias in selection of participants into the study | Bias in classification of the exposure | Bias due to departures from intended exposures | Bias due to missing data | Bias in measurement of the outcome | Bias in selection of the reported results | Reporting quality | Generalisability | Precision/sample size | Other |
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale38 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Duration of follow-up | |||
AHRQ Checklist for Cross-Sectional Studies60 | X | X | X | ||||||||
Quality in Prognosis Studies61 | X | X | X | X | X | X | Appropriateness of the statistical methods | ||||
ROBINS-I7 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
SIGN checklist for cohort studies62 | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
SIGN checklist for case-control studies62 | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
STROBE63 | X | ||||||||||
Cochrane risk of bias tool9 | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools for cohort studies30 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Magnitude of effect, Bradford-Hill Criteria | |||
Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventative services64 | X | X | X | X | X | X | Appropriateness of the statistical methods, control for design effects, accounting for different levels of exposure in segments of the study population in the analysis | ||||
Effective Public Health Practice Project65 | X | X | X | X | X | X | Appropriateness of the statistical methods | ||||
Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool66 | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
NICE Methodological Checklist for Cohort Studies67 | X | X | X | X | Duration of follow-up | ||||||
NICE Methodological Checklist for Case-Control Studies67 | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies31 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Duration of follow-up | ||
Quality Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (QATSO)68 | X | X | X | Privacy and sensitive nature of the question considered | |||||||
Research Triangle Institute Item Bank on Risk of Bias69 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Study design, prespecification of the outcomes, duration of follow-up, missing outcomes, appropriateness of statistical methods, believability of the results, reporting of funding | ||
Ad hoc criteria | |||||||||||
Theal et al. 201870 (combined two sets of ad hoc criteria) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | Appropriateness of statistical methods | |||
Beydoun et al. 201971 | X | X | X | Study design | |||||||
Gianfredi et al. 2018 Gianfredi et al. 201872 73 |
X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Asgari-Taee et al. 201874 | X | X | X | Study design, appropriateness of statistical methods, validity of findings | |||||||
Padilha et al. 201875 | X | ||||||||||
Dandamudi et al. 201876
(combined two sets of ad hoc criteria) |
X | X | X | X | |||||||
Dobbels et al. 201977 | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Dallacker et al. 201878 | X | X | X | Study design |
AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; STROBE, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology.