Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;4(2):519–531. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218

Table 1.

Summary relative risks for high versus low and dose–response analyses of main exposures and type 2 diabetes

Main exposures High versus low analysis Dose–response analysis
n RR (95% CI) I2 Ph Egger References n Increment RR (95% CI) I2 Ph Egger References
Fruit and vegetables 10 0.93 (0.89 to 0.98) 0 0.47 0.95 5 6 14–17 22 42 58 60 7 Per 200 g/day 0.98 (0.95 to 1.01) 37.8 0.14 0.41 5 6 14–16 22 60
 Fruits 20 0.93 (0.90 to 0.97) 9.3 0.34 0.47 6–10 12–23 19 Per 200 g/day 0.96 (0.92 to 1.00) 68.4 <0.0001 0.27 6–10 12–16 18–23
 Vegetables 17 0.95 (0.88 to 1.02) 60.4 0.001 0.62 5 6 8 9 11 13–20 22–24 15 Per 200 g/day 0.97 (0.94 to 1.01) 39.2 0.06 0.03 5 6 8 9 11 13–16 18–20 22–24

n, number of studies; Ph, p value for heterogeneity; RR, relative risk.