Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;14:100366. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100366

Table 3.

Students' perceptions on importance of different stakeholders in addressing antimicrobial resistance.


Level of perceived importance
Statistical analyses between levels of perceived contribution
Stakeholders I (%) S (%) U (%) p (I vs S) p (I vs U) p (S vs U)
Doctors 100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Veterinarians 100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Dentists 97.8 2.2 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Professional associations (e.g., Australian Veterinary
Association)
100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Animal industry organisations (e.g., Meat and Livestock Australia) 100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Global organisations (e.g., World Health Organisation, World Organisation for Animal Health) 100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Human hospitals 100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Veterinary hospitals 100 0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Farmers and producers 98.9 1.1 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Government and policy makers 98.9 1.1 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Scientists and microbiologists 98.9 1.1 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Other veterinary students 98.9 1.1 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Pharmaceutical companies 97.8 2.2 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Pharmacists 96.7 3.3 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Myself 95.6 4.4 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
Nurses 94.5 5.5 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 ns
The community and general public 91.1 8.9 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0066
Pet owners 90.0 10.0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0032
The media 88.9 11.1 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0015
Family and friends 80.0 20.0 0 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

I = moderately / very / extremely important; S = slightly / not important; U = unsure; ns = not significant.