Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 21;2003(3):CD003570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003570

Foresi 1996.

Methods DESIGN: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐ controlled, parallel study 
 METHOD OF RANDOMISATION: not stated 
 CONCEALMENT OF RANDOMISATION: not stated 
 PATIENT, PROVIDER AND OUTCOME ASSESSOR BLINDING: 
 not described in detail but double‐blind stated 
 WITHDRAWALS/ DROP‐OUTS: not stated
Participants ELIGIBLE: not stated 
 ENROLLED: 50 
 COMPLETED: 50 
 AGE (MEAN): 27.8 
 SEX (male/female): stated but with an error (33/21) 
 NUMBER IN THE TREATMENT GROUP: 24 
 NUMBER IN THE CONTROL GROUP: 26 
 RECRUITMENT: 2 outpatient clinics from northern Italy 
 ASTHMA DIAGNOSIS: no asthma 
 ASTHMA SEVERITY: 0 
 RHINITIS DIAGNOSIS: clinical criteria 
 RHINITIS CLASSIFICATION: allergic seasonal rhinitis 
 ATOPY MARKERS: SPT for a mixture of grasses or parieteria 
 INCLUSION: history of seasonal allergic rhinitis of at least 3 years, no asthma, no previous specific immunotherapy 
 EXCLUSION: nasal polyps and sinusitis, esthablished asthma or wheeze, antihistamines in the previous 6 weeks, nasal surgery in the previous 6 months
Interventions SETTING: Not certain but in northen Italy 
 TREATMENT GROUP: intranasal fluticasone 50 ug/ in 2 puffs in each nostril once a day = 200 ug/d 
 CONTROL GROUP: intranasal placebo 2 puffs in each nostril 1 day (rescue medication for both groups: salbutamol spray, terfenadine 60 mg, Na cromoglycate eye drops (dose not specified) 
 DURATION: 6 weeks
Outcomes ‐chest symptoms at the end of trial (visit 4) 
 ‐FEV1 (L) at the end of the trial at week 6 
 ‐PC20 methacholine (mg) at the end of the trial
Notes Jadad score 3
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available