Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261963

Table 1. Summary of tagged great egrets.

days tracked on Tomales Bay number of steps by end location
Bird ID capture site total days date range eelgrass shellfish tidal marsh other tidal total steps
GREG_10 CG 360 Sep 21, 2018; Jul 31, 2020 4074 100 1116 7420 12710
GREG_8 TP 343 Jul 23, 2018; Jun 30, 2020 3874 386 414 5417 10091
GREG_2 TP 188 Jun 10, 2017; Jun 22, 2018 1463 1038 2029 4006 8536
GREG_1 TP 182 Jun 10, 2017; Aug 31, 2018 2545 672 666 3167 7050
GREG_3 TP 113 Jun 11, 2017; Jun 22, 2018 1672 882 1754 2016 6324
GREG_6 WC 123 Jun 12, 2018; Aug 17, 2019 1740 674 641 2708 5763
GREG_11* CG 173 Mar 26, 2019; Jul 9, 2020 2078 3 754 2417 5252
GREG_7* CG 144 Jul 5, 2018; Dec 12, 2018 978 6 593 1822 3399
GREG_5 TP 73 Jun 8, 2018; Feb 7, 2019 1288 199 111 1588 3186
GREG_9* CG 77 Sep 19, 2018; Dec 4, 2018 275 2 807 1944 3028

Number of days tracked on Tomales Bay, CA and number of steps ending in each wetland type for GPS tagged great egrets. Capture sites are as follows: CG = Cypress Grove; TP = Toms Point; WC = Walker Creek. Models failed to converge for birds with few observed steps in shellfish aquaculture areas (indicated by *), so these egrets were excluded from statistical analysis. Total number of days is less than the number of days comprising the date range for egrets that left the study area for migration or other movements.