Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 18;43(1):56–67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab441

Table 3.

Treatment effect (percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting) on all-cause death in diabetic and non-diabetic patients

PCI (n = 903) CABG (n = 897) Unadjusted HR (95% CI) Unadjusted P-value Adjusted HR (95% CI) AdjustedP-value P  -interaction
10 years
 Diabetes 36.4% (80) 34.5% (72) 1.10 (0.80–1.52) 0.551 1.15 (0.80–1.65) 0.440 0.856
 No diabetes 25.8% (168) 21.4% (140) 1.23 (0.98–1.53) 0.076 1.30 (1.01–1.66) 0.041
Maximum follow-up
 Diabetes 51.7% (94) 67.3% (93) 1.00 (0.75–1.33) 0.991 1.06 (0.77–1.47) 0.712 0.394
 No diabetes 37.9% (209) 33.3% (172) 1.26 (1.03–1.55) 0.024 1.34 (1.07–1.68) 0.010

Percentage of deaths at a given time point, based on Kaplan–Meier estimates (number of deaths). The number of patients entered into the multivariable Cox model was 87.3% (1177/1348) patients in non-diabetic group and 86.9% (393/452) patients in diabetic group, respectively. Test of interaction is on adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.

CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.