Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosurg. 2021 Jul 2;136(1):148–155. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.JNS202031

TABLE 1.

Association between allelic burden of somatic KRAS mutation and three phenotypes of BAVM severity

KRAS Mutation No. of Patients Age at Tissue Collection*
BAVM Size*
Age at First ICH
Coefficient (95% CI) p Value Coefficient (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value

G12D or G12V

 Allelic burden % 56 0.7 (−2.9 to 4.3) 0.69 1.4 (−0.7 to 3.6) 0.18 0.87 (0.64–1.20) 0.40

 Presence 56 1.3 (−8.9 to 11.4) 0.80 3.2 (−2.8 to 9.2) 0.29 0.77 (0.35–1.72) 0.53

G12D

 Allelic burden % 57 2.4 (−2.6 to 7.3) 0.35 1.6 (−1.4 to 4.5) 0.30 0.95 (0.67–1.34) 0.76

 Presence 57 1.6 (−9.5 to 12.7) 0.77 2.4 (−4.2 to 9.0) 0.47 0.90 (0.39–2.06) 0.80

G12V

 Allelic burden % 65 −0.6 (−5.1 to 4.0) 0.80 0.9 (−1.6 to 3.4) 0.48 0.87 (0.56–1.35) 0.53

 Presence 65 0.4 (−17.1 to 17.9) 0.97 3.0 (−6.6 to 12.5) 0.54 0.68 (0.16–2.96) 0.61
*

Results of linear regression models, adjusted for sex and prior ICH.

Results of Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for sex and BAVM size. Patients without ICH at age of tissue collection were censored.