Reid 1992.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "...each patient randomly received one capsule..." Page 12 ‐ Study design |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation was blinded randomly by hospital pharmacists |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | “Six patients decided not to take suppositories...” Page 13 ‐ Results “...31 of the original 41 patients complied well...” Page 13 ‐ Results “...nine did not return for long‐term follow up so could not be included in recurrent UTI analysis” Table Page 13 |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | All outcomes appear to be reported in full. No published protocol cited or available. |
Other bias | High risk | Sponsored by Merck Frosst Used skim milk placebo – unknown effect on promotion or inhibition of UTI or lactobacillus growth/colonisation |