Summary of findings 3. Outreach treatment compared to hospital treatment for persons with an intellectual disability.
Outreach treatment compared to hospital treatment for persons with an intellectual disability | |||
Patient or population: persons with an intellectual disability Setting: The Netherlands Intervention: outreach treatment Comparison: hospital treatment | |||
Outcomes | No. of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Impact |
Behavioural problems | 49 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low 1 2 3 | It is uncertain whether outreach treatment decreases behavioural problems. |
Care giver burden | 49 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low | It is uncertain whether outreach treatment decreases care giver burden. |
Costs | 49 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low | It is uncertain whether outreach treatment decreases costs. |
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1 Downgraded for risk of bias as unclear allocation concealment and random sequence generation; surrogate main outcome; high risk of selective reporting.
2 Downgraded for indirectness as main outcome was surrogate; generalisability of intervention unclear.
3 Downgraded for imprecision based on sample size and wide confidence intervals.