Table 2.

Demographic information and design features of intervention studies for ASD college students.

Paper	Participant Group	Diagnosis Method*	Study Design	N	% male	Age Range (yrs)
Ashbaugh et al., 2017	ASD college students	Community; Confirmed with DSM-4 TR or DSM-5	Social Planning & Peer Mentor	3	33	19–24
Capriola-Hall et al., 2020 *	ASD college students	Community; confirmed with ADOS-2	Mentorship Program	16 treatment	68.75	16–25
			Transition as Usual	16 control	81.25	16–25
Furuhashi, 2017	ASD college students	Community	Group Therapy	15	73	19–24
Hillier et al., 2018	ASD college students	Community	Support Groups	52	98	18–28
Hotez et al., 2018	ASD college students	Community	Transition Program	10	80	17–22
Koegel et al., 2013	ASD college students	Community; confirmed with DSM-5	Social Planning & Mentorship Program	3	100	21–23
Lucas & James, 2018	ASD college students	Community	Mentorship Program	8	75	nr
	MHC college students	Community	Mentorship Program	7	14	nr
Pugliese & White, 2014	ASD college students	Community; Confirmed with ADOS	Group Therapy	5	100	18–23
Rando et al., 2016	ASD college students	Community	Mentorship Program	12	80	nr
Schindler et al., 2015	ASD college students	Community	Mentorship Program	11	64	18–20
Weiss & Rohland, 2015	ASD college students	Community	Coaching Program	23	65	nr
White et al., 2019 *	ASD college students	Community; confirmed with ADOS-2	Mentorship Program	17 treatment	70.6	16–25
			Transition as Usual	18 control	72.2	16–25
White et al., 2016	ASD college students	Community; Confirmed with ADOS	Psychosocial Intervention	4 CLS	nr	18–22
			Computer Task Intervention	4 BCI	nr	19–23

ASD: Autism Spectrum Disorder

MHC: Mental health conditions

DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

SCQ: Social Communication Questionnaire

ADOS: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule

CLS: College and Living Success program

BCI: Brain-Computer Interface program

nr: not reported

^*same sample used