Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;25(6):664–675. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.006

Table 2.

Interventions, dosage, drop-out and adherence, results of primary and secondary outcomes, and adverse effects in included studies.

Study Interventions, number of participants and exercises Dosage Drop-out and adherence Results for DRA presence or IRD in cm, mean ± SD Results for secondary outcomes Adverse effects
Walton et al. 201630 Experimental group (n=5)
  • Plank (10 s. on knees or toes)

«Traditional» training (n=4)
  • Modified sit-up

Both programs contained;
  • Posterior pelvic tilt

  • PFM exercises

  • Exercises for oblique abdominals

  • Use of abdominal binding during exercise

Duration: 6 weeks
Dosage: 3 × 10 repetitions, 3x/week.
(Gradually increase repetitions during the period)

Total drop-out: 1
Adherence: Not reported
Post-test:
Experimental: IRD: 0.76 ± 0.2
Traditional: IRD: 0.66 ± 0.17
No significant difference in decrease in IRD between groups, at the level at the umbilicus: 0.10 (95% CI: −0.14, 0.34)
  • ODI:

No significant difference between groups (p = 0.569)
  • PFDI:

No significant difference between groups (UDI score; p = 0.117)
Not reported
Kamel & Jousif 201732 Abdominal exercise + NMES (n=30)Group A NMES was applied first, followed by the abdominal exercisesAbdominal exercise with abdominal binding (n=30)Group B
  • Sit-up

  • Reverse sit-up

  • Reverse trunk twist

  • U-seat

  • Respiratory rehabilitation maneuver during exercises

Duration: 8 weeks
Dosage: 20 repetitions, 3x/week
(Increase with 4 repetitions/week)
Total drop-out: 3
Abdominal exercise (n = 2)
Abdominal exercise + NMES (n = 1)
Adherence: Analysis on patients who finished all sessions (same as described in drop-out)
Post-test:
Abdominal exercise + NMES:
IRD: 1.43 ± 0.38
Abdominal exercise:
IRD: 2.09 ± 0.35
Significant difference in decrease in IRD between groups: −0.65 (95% CI: −0.85, −0.46)
  • Abdominal muscle strength:

Significant difference in group A compared to group B in peak torque (N/m): 5.22 (95% CI: 1.95, 8.5)
Not reported
Bobowik & Dąbek, 201831 Physical therapy program (n=20)
Part 1: Prone lying for 20 min.
Part 2: Three supine abdominal exercises with respiratory maneuver (headlift, sit-up, and “cycling”)
Part 3: Education (in/out of bed, lifting the baby, breastfeeding++)
(Elastic tape was used once a week)
Minimal intervention group (n=20) Contained no exercise or tape, only education
Duration: 6 weeks
Dosage:
Hold: 10 s, 10 repetitions/exercise, every day
Drop-out and adherence not reported
Post-test:
Minimal intervention: DRA: 1.68 ± 0.7
Physical therapy: DRA: 0.4 ± 0.23
Significant difference in IRD between groups: −1.28 (95% CI: −1.60, −0.69)
Not reported
Tuttle et al. 201828 TRA training (n=10)
Home exercise, in-drawing in four different positions with respiratory maneuver
Tape (n=8)
Participants taped themselves with a x-shape, and used the tape for 4–5 days, then 2–4 days off before a new intervention period with tape
TRA+tape (n=5)
Combination of TRA training and kinesiotape
Minimal intervention group (n=7)
Instructed to maintain normal level of activity
Duration: 12 weeks
Dosage: 10 repetitions, 4–5 days/week
Total drop-out: 3
TRA (n = 1), TRA + tape: (n = 1), tape (n = 1)
Adherence:
Average all groups: 79%
TRA training only: 95%
Post test1
TRA: IRD: 1.34 ± 0.37
Minimal intervention: IRD: 2.1 ± 0.99
Close to a significant difference in IRD between groups: −0.76 (95% CI: −1.53, 0.01)
Significant better decrease in IRD at rest and during head lift in the groups with TRA training compared to control/tape (post hoc t-test)
  • PFDI-20:

No significant difference between groups (p >0.05).
  • RMDQ:

No significant difference between groups (p >0.05).
Not reported
Gluppe et al. 201825 Postpartum training program (n=87)
Weekly supervised exercise class with strength training of PFM in 5 different positions in addition to strength exercises for abdominal,2 back, arm, and thigh muscles. Daily PFM training at home
Minimal intervention group (n=88)
Received only standard information about exercise postpartum
Duration: 16 weeks
Dosage: 3 × 8–12 repetitions.
PFM training daily, group training once a week
6 months
Total drop-out: 13; intervention (n = 10), control (n = 3)
12 months
Total drop-out: 5; intervention (n = 1), control (n = 4)
Adherence:
Postpartum training program: 80% adherence to training for 96% of women
Post-test
6 months:
Exercise: DRA, 43.7%
Minimal intervention: DRA, 44.3%
12 months:
Exercise: DRA, 41.4%
Minimal intervention: DRA, 39.8%
No significant difference between groups 6 months PP, (RR: 0.99 [0.71, 1.38]) or 12 months PP, (RR: 1.04 [0.73, 1.49])
Not reported
Thabet & Alshehri 201933 Deep core stability-strengthening program (+ traditional exercises) (n=20)
Group A
Use of abdominal binding, respiratory maneuver, PFM exercises, plank and isometric abdominal contraction
Traditional abdominal exercises (n=20)Group B
Static abdominal contractions, posterior pelvic tilt, reverse sit-up, trunk twist and reverse trunk
Duration: 8 weeks
Dosage: 3 × 20 repetitions, 3/week
No drop-out
Adherence: Not reported
Post-test:
Deep core training:
IRD: 2.01 ± 0.07
Traditional exercises:
IRD: 2.37 ± 0.11
Significant difference in IRD between groups = −0.36 (95% CI: −0.42, −0.30)
  • PF10:

Significant difference in group A compared to group B: 5.25, p = 0.0001
Not reported
Keshwani et al. 201929 Exercise therapy (n=8)
Weekly individual sessions and daily home exercise including exercises for isolated activation of TRA
Abdominal binding (n=8)
Wear binding during waking hours
Combination therapy (n=8)
Combination of exercise therapy and abdominal binding
Minimal intervention group (n=8)
Contained no intervention or education
Duration: 12 weeks
Dosage: 3 × 10 repetitions, 7x/week
6 months
Total drop-out: 5; exercise therapy (n = 2), control (n = 1), exercise therapy+abdominal binding (n = 2)
Adherence:
Exercise therapy; 73% (home exercise) and 10/12 of the weekly sessions
Abdominal binding; 60%
Combination group was similar to the interventions delivered alone
Post-test: 6 months
Exercise therapy:
IRD: −0.93 ± 0.88
Abdominal binding:
IRD: −1.34 ± 0.34
Combination:
IRD: −1.24 ± 0.73)
Minimal intervention:
IRD: −1.31 ± 1.08
No significant difference between groups. When comparing exercise therapy to control, no significant difference between groups was found: −0.38 (95% CI: −1.45, 0.68)
  • Abdominal muscle strength:

Positive effects (Cohen`s d (d)= 0.5–0.7) in the exercise and combination groups.
  • PFDI:

No effects in any groups
  • Body image:

Positive effects (d = 0.2–0.5) in the abdominal binding alone and combination groups.
  • IFSAC

No effects (d = 0.0–0.3) in any groups
Not reported

DRA, diastasis recti abdominis; IFSAC, inventory of functional status after childbirth; IRD, inter-recti distance; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PFDI, Pelvic Floor Distress Index; PF10, the Physical Functioning scale; PFM, pelvic floor muscle; PP, postpartum; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RMDQ, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; TrA, transversus abdominis; UDI, Urinary distress inventory (1/3 subscales of PFDI).

1

Results are presented for measurements at the level at the umbilicus at rest.

2

The weekly exercise class included 3 sets of 8–12 contractions of each of the following abdominal exercises; draw-in (on all fours), draw-in (prone), half-plank, side-plank, oblique sit-up or sit-up.