Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2019 Jun 7;125(18):3107–3110. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32205

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Doses, Local Therapies, Local Failure Rates, and Patient Outcomes in Trials on Rhabdomyosarcoma

Study Cyclophosphamide Dose, g/m2
Local Therapy Characteristics
Local Failure Rate, %
Outcomes:
FFS/EFS and OS
Per Cycle Cumulative Dose Timing, wk DPE, % Group III PM >5 cm Group III Emb/Alv
IRSG-IV5 2.2 26.4 9 0.8 16 34 13 5-y FFS: 70% 5-y OS: 75%
D98036 2.2 25.1-30.8 12 45 19.5 25 19.4/17.7 4-y EFS: 68%-73% 5-y OS: 79%
ARST05317 1.2 8.4-16.8 4 16 27.7 32.3 27.9/20.2 4-y EFS: 59%-63% 4-y OS: 72%-73%
MSKCC 1.2-2.2 10-24 13 NR 12.5 NR 10.6/6.8 2-y EFS: 74.6% 2-y OS: 84.1%
RMS 2005 ≈1.5 + maint ≈17.7 13 NR NR NR NR 3-y EFS: 78.4% (maint) vs 72.3%3-y OS: 87.3% (maint) vs 77.4%
ARST1431 1.2 + maint 12.6 13

Abbreviations: DPE, delayed primary excision; EFS, event-free survival; Emb/Alv, embryonal/alveolar; FFS, failure-free survival; IRSG-IV, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group IV; maint, maintenance; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; NR, not reported; PM, parameningeal; OS overall survival; RMS 2005, Rhabdomyosarcoma 2005.