Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 14;23(2):49. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.13167

Table I.

Correlation between GIMAP2 expression and the clinical classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Results of immunostaining No. of patients (%)

Variable Total GIMAP2 negative GIMAP2 positive P-value
Age at surgery (years)
  >70 41 14 (34) 27 (66) 0.580a
  60-70 35 16 (46) 19 (54)
  <60 24 10 (42) 14 (58)
Sex
  Male 57 21 (37) 36 (63) 0.458a
  Female 43 19 (44) 24 (56)
T-primary tumor
  T1+T2 51 32 (63) 19 (37) 0.0004a,b
  T3+T4 49 8 (16) 41 (84)
N-regional lymph node
  Negative 63 24 (38) 39 (62) 0.612a
  Positive 37 16 (43) 21 (57)
Stage
  I 15 10 (67) 5 (33) 0.004a,b
  II 20 12 (60) 8 (40)
  III 18 7 (39) 11 (61)
  IV 47 11 (23) 36 (77)
Histopathologic type
  Good 68 28 (41) 40 (59) 0.811a
  Moderate 28 11 (39) 17 (61)
  Poor 4 1 (25) 3 (75)
Vascular Invasion
  Negative 62 24 (39) 38 (61) 0.737a
  Positive 38 16 (42) 22 (58)
a

χ2 test;

b

P<0.05. GIMAP2, GTPase of immunity-associated protein 2.