Table A1. Identification Response Frequencies Made by Subjects in Young-Late (10–12) and Late-Late (13–17) Conditions at Different Postidentification Confidence Levels in Target-Present and Target-Absent Lineups.
Young-Late | Late-Late | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target present | Target absent | Target present | Target absent | ||||||||||||
Confidence | Culprit | Filler | Reject | Filler | Reject | Culprit | Filler | Reject | Filler | Reject | |||||
Note. Confidence was collected using a pictorial 5-point water cup rating scale. Empty cup = “not at all sure” to Full cup = “very sure.” When an equal-variance signal detection model was fit to these data, d′ was estimated to also be the same across the young-late and late-late groups. | |||||||||||||||
Empty cup | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |||||
¼ full cup | 6 | 4 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 4 | |||||
½ full cup | 47 | 10 | 35 | 35 | 54 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 16 | |||||
¾ full cup | 59 | 7 | 28 | 26 | 63 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | |||||
Full cup | 18 | 2 | 21 | 3 | 35 | 14 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 10 | |||||
Total | 130 | 24 | 93 | 76 | 163 | 50 | 9 | 32 | 29 | 43 | |||||
Proportion | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.60 |