Table 1.
Component | Indicator | Data collection | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
Preparation phase | |||
Recruitment and evaluation |
-Recruitment process -Participant number -Time to recruit -Refusal rates -Feasibility/suitability inclusion criteria -Obstacles recruitment -Relevance of program to population |
-Project notes | -Document analysis [32] |
Reach | Number of DSPs from team | Project notes during delivery | -Calculation of DSPs from team |
Context |
-Environment changes (physical, social, political) -Other interventions |
-Questionnaire DSPs -Questionnaire managers -Interviews DSPs |
-Check on changes in environment beside the program -Check on other interventions (yes/no) |
Implementation phase | |||
Dose delivered | Completion program | Project notes during delivery | -Calculation of completion of each part of the program |
Dose received |
-Execution of assignments -Activity during sessions |
-Questionnaire DSPs -Reflection of trainers on sessions -Reflection of researcher (AO) on one session -Quality of assignments |
-Descriptive statistics -Quality assignments checked with the following question: ‘Do the assignments show that the DSP understood the assignment?’ [23], and scored according to the following categories: ++ Almost everything on the assignment is correct, + there are more points on the assignment that are correct than points that are not correct, − there are fewer points on the assignment that are correct than points that do not match, -- almost everything on the assignment is not correct. |
Fidelity | Execution of sessions by trainers |
-Reflection of trainers on sessions -Reflection of researcher (AO) on one session |
-Descriptive statistics |
Acceptability/suitability program |
-Fit of program in daily practice (trainers, DSPs, managers) -Acceptability of program for DSPs and managers -Time/capacity to complete program (DSPs, managers) |
-Reflection of trainers on sessions -Questionnaire DSPs -Questionnaire managers -Interviews DSPs |
-Document analysis -Descriptive statistics -Conventional content analysis [33] |
Factors during implementation | -Facilitators/barriers during implementation (expertise, capacity, budget, equipment available) | -Project notes during implementation | -Document analysis |
Evaluation of data collection process |
-Feasibility/suitability data collection procedures (missing data, understanding questions, time-consuming) -Sensitivity of outcome measures to changes after the program |
-Project notes during data collection -Evaluation of outcomes in relation to methods |
-Document analysis |
Outcomes | |||
Changes after the program |
-Goal achievement after program -Actual application in practice (DSPs, assignments, managers) -Attitude DSPs (T0, T1 and T2) -Food intake people with ID (T0, T2) -Physical activity of people with ID (T0, T2) |
-Questionnaire DSPs -Questionnaire managers -Interviews DSPs -Assignments -Food diaries -Actigraph/Actiwatch/ Inventory of daily activity program |
-Descriptive statistics -Conventional content analysis [33] -Application check assignments -Attitude changes: linear mixed models [34] in statistical programming language R [35]. -Food diaries: descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed Rank test -Actigraph: descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed Rank test -Actiwatch: descriptive statistics, calculating %inactive/active time -Inventory of daily activity program: descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed Rank test |