Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 3;54:1. doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00692-5

Table 4.

Correlations between log-transformed variance of litter size and EBV for LnVarc and DHGLMc obtained from three-fold cross-validationa

Validation run Correlations of ln(var(TNB))b with
EBV from LnVarc EBV from DHGLMc
1 0.47 0.55
2 0.42 0.49
3 0.40 0.44
Average 0.43 0.49

aThree-fold cross-validation was performed to compare the two methods used to obtain phenotypic variability of litter size: log-transformed variance of residuals (LnVar) and double hierarchical GLM (DHGLM)

bLog-transformed variance of litter size per sow

cEstimated in each run for 3650 sows with their records set to missing