Table 1.
Study | Role for Treg cells | Model | Infarct volume | Treg depletion | Treg adoption | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liesz et al. [34] | Protective | Mice: pMCAO | 10–30 mm3 | Anti-CD25 mAb | None | Infarct size was enlarged significantly 3 and 7 days after pMCAO |
None | CD4+CD25- cells, total CD4+ cells, or Treg cells to RAG2−/− mice 7 days before MCAO | Larger infarct size in the mice received CD4+CD25− cells | ||||
Zhang et al. [35] | Protective | Mice: 60 min tMCAO | 20–70 mm3 | DEREG mice | IL-2/IL-2Ab | Decreased infarct size and improved sensorimotor outcomes 3 and 7 days after tMCAO |
Kleinschnitz et al. [26] | Detrimental | Mice: 30 or 60 min tMCAO | 60–90 mm3 | DEREG mice | None | Reduced infarct volumes and better neurological function 1 day after IS |
5–10 mm3 | DEREG mice | CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, CD4+ CD25− T cells, CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells, or CD4+CD25− FoxP3− T cells to RAG2−/−mice | Larger infarct size than RAG−/−mice | |||
Schuhmann et al. [36] | Detrimental | Mice: 30 min tMCAO | 40–80 mm3 | None | CD28 SA | Enhanced infarct size and worse functional outcomes |
30–40 mm3 | Rag1−/−mice or DEREG mice | CD28 SA | No significant difference in infarct size and behavior texting between treatment groups and controls | |||
Ren et al. [37] | Neutral | Mice: 60 min tMCAO | ~50% (Cortex; Hemisphere) ~90% (Striatum)a | DEREG mice | None | No significant difference in infarct volumes and behavioral evaluations |
Stubbe et al. [22] | Neutral | Mice: 30 min tMCAO | ~40 mm3 | Anti-CD25 mAb | None | No significant difference associated with Treg depletion |
aThis study analyzed the outcomes with infarct volume percent of the lesion.