Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;43(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00641-4

Table 1.

Studies investigating the outcome of Treg cells in murine models.

Study Role for Treg cells Model Infarct volume Treg depletion Treg adoption Outcome
Liesz et al. [34] Protective Mice: pMCAO 10–30 mm3 Anti-CD25 mAb None Infarct size was enlarged significantly 3 and 7 days after pMCAO
None CD4+CD25- cells, total CD4+ cells, or Treg cells to RAG2−/− mice 7 days before MCAO Larger infarct size in the mice received CD4+CD25 cells
Zhang et al. [35] Protective Mice: 60 min tMCAO 20–70 mm3 DEREG mice IL-2/IL-2Ab Decreased infarct size and improved sensorimotor outcomes 3 and 7 days after tMCAO
Kleinschnitz et al. [26] Detrimental Mice: 30 or 60 min tMCAO 60–90 mm3 DEREG mice None Reduced infarct volumes and better neurological function 1 day after IS
5–10 mm3 DEREG mice CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells, CD4+ CD25 T cells, CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells, or CD4+CD25 FoxP3 T cells to RAG2/−mice Larger infarct size than RAG−/−mice
Schuhmann et al. [36] Detrimental Mice: 30 min tMCAO 40–80 mm3 None CD28 SA Enhanced infarct size and worse functional outcomes
30–40 mm3 Rag1−/−mice or DEREG mice CD28 SA No significant difference in infarct size and behavior texting between treatment groups and controls
Ren et al. [37] Neutral Mice: 60 min tMCAO ~50% (Cortex; Hemisphere) ~90% (Striatum)a DEREG mice None No significant difference in infarct volumes and behavioral evaluations
Stubbe et al. [22] Neutral Mice: 30 min tMCAO ~40 mm3 Anti-CD25 mAb None No significant difference associated with Treg depletion

aThis study analyzed the outcomes with infarct volume percent of the lesion.