Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;2022(1):CD013345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013345.pub2

Du 2017.

Methods Study design: Randomised clinical trial
Study duration: December 2012 to December 2015
Duration of follow‐up: Not reported
Setting: Hospital
Participants Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed as HCC by liver biopsy; the maximal tumour diameter ≥ 5 cm; single tumour
Exclusion criteria: Portal vein was completely obstructed; serious portal hypertension
Age (mean ± SD, range): TACE + RFA: 57.14 ± 5.27 years, 28‐73 years; TACE alone: 57.48 ± 3.71 years, 26‐71 years
Male (n/total): TACE + RFA: 28/40; TACE alone: 27/40
Tumour diameter (mean ± SD): TACE + RFA: 8.27 ± 2.35 cm; TACE alone: 8.80 ± 2.57 cm
Serum level of AFP:
Abnormal: TACE + RFA: 38 patients; TACE alone: 36 patients
Normal: TACE + RFA: 2 patients; TACE alone: 4 patients
Interventions TACE + RFA group (n = 40):
TACE: Chemotherapeutic drugs: epirubicin 50‐60 mg
RFA: Output power of 70‐90 W. Multiple sessions of RFA were performed with an interval of 1‐2 weeks. For patients with the tumour maximal diameter less than 10 cm, the total time per RFA treatment was 30‐60 minutes. For patients with the tumour maximal diameter ≥ 10 cm, the total time per RFA treatment was 80‐100 minutes.
TACE group (n = 40):
Chemotherapeutic drugs: epirubicin 50‐60 mg
Outcomes Tumour response: measured by image examinations at 6 months after treatment
Clinical efficacy (serum level of ALT, TBIL, AFP, and tumour diameter)
Adverse events
Notes Country of study: China
Source of funding: None
There was insufficient information available to satisfactorily determine the method of randomisation and the study data could not be verified. We have attempted to contact the study authors for more information, but so far, we have not been successful in doing this.