Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;2022(1):CD013345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013345.pub2

Ma 2019a.

Methods Study design: Randomised clinical trial
Study duration: April 2017 to February 2018
Duration of follow‐up: Not reported
Setting: Hospital
Participants Age (mean ± SD, range): TACE + RFA: 65.1 ± 5.9 years, 52‐77 years; TACE: 64.7 ± 5.8 years, 53‐76 years
Male (n/total): TACE + RFA: 32/50; TACE alone: 34/50
Tumour diameter (mean ± SD, range): TACE + RFA: 4.1 ± 1.6 cm, 2‐7 cm; TACE alone:4.0 ± 1.3 cm, 2‐8 cm
Child‐Pugh Class (patients):
Class A: TACE + RFA: 29; TACE: 31
Class B: TACE + RFA: 21; TACE: 19
Interventions TACE + RFA group (n = 50):
TACE: Chemotherapeutic drugs: cisplatin 40‐80 mg, epirubicin 30‐50 mg, and theprubicin 20 mg
RFA: CT‐guided RFA. RITA 1500 system
TACE group (n = 50):
Chemotherapeutic drugs: cisplatin 40‐80 mg, epirubicin 30‐50 mg, and theprubicin 20 mg
Outcomes Tumour response, based on RECIST criteria
Liver function
Tumour diameter
Adverse events
Notes Country of study: China
Source of funding: None
There was insufficient information available to satisfactorily determine the method of randomisation and the study data could not be verified. We have attempted to contact the study authors for more information, but so far, we have not been successful in doing this.