Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;2022(1):CD013345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013345.pub2

Wen 2018.

Methods Study design: Randomised clinical trial
Study duration: March 2013 to March 2015
Duration of follow‐up: 2 years
Setting: Hospital
Participants Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed as HCC by pathology; huge HCC; tumour volume < 70% of whole liver volume; with liver function of Child‐Pugh Class A or B; ECOG ≤ 2
Exclusion criteria: With liver function of Child‐Pugh Class C; abnormal haematopoietic function; life expectancy < 6 months; with serious disease of other organs
Age (mean ± SD): TACE + cryoablation: 53. 2 ± 12. 3 years; TACE alone: 54.8 ± 10.2 years
Male (n/total): TACE + cryoablation: 35/43; TACE alone: 37/43
Vascular invasion (patients): TACE + cryoablation: 6; TACE: 4
Interventions TACE + cryoablation group (n = 43):
TACE: Chemotherapeutic drugs: lobaplatin
Cryoablation: The interval between TACE and RFA was 1 week. Ultrasound‐guided cryoablation.
TACE group (n = 43):
Chemotherapeutic drugs: lobaplatin
Outcomes Tumour response, classified as complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progression
Adverse events
1‐ and 2‐year survival rates
Notes Country of study: China
Source of funding: None
There was insufficient information available to satisfactorily determine the method of randomisation and the study data could not be verified. We have attempted to contact the study authors for more information, but so far, we have not been successful in doing this.