Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;2022(1):CD013345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013345.pub2

Xiong 2013.

Methods Study design: Randomised clinical trial
Study duration: January 2009 to May 2011
Duration of follow‐up: Not reported
Setting: Hospital
Participants Inclusion criteria: Aged ≥ 60 years; diagnosed as HCC by pathology; unsuitable for resection or unwilling to accept surgery; Karnofsky score ≥ 60; life expectancy ≥ 3 months; no contraindications for TACE or HIFU; no extrahepatic metastasis; tumour volume ≤ 70% of whole liver volume
Age (mean ± SD, range): TACE + RFA: 73.4 ± 4.5 years; TACE alone: 74.2 ± 5.6 years
Male (n/total): TACE + RFA: 20/35; TACE alone: 21/35
Tumour diameter (mean ± SD): TACE + RFA: 6.3 ± 2.1 cm; TACE: 6.5 ± 2.0 cm
Child‐Pugh Class (patients):
Class A: TACE + RFA: 27; TACE: 28
Class B: TACE + RFA: 8; TACE: 7
Interventions TACE + RFA group (n = 35):
TACE: Chemotherapeutic drugs: 5‐fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin
RFA: The interval between TACE and RFA was 1‐2 weeks. Ablation margin of 0.5‐1 cm
TACE group (n = 35):
Chemotherapeutic drugs: 5‐fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin
Outcomes Serum level of AFP
Tumour response, assessed at 6 weeks after treatment, measured by contrast‐enhanced CT or MRI
Notes Country of study: China
Source of funding: None
There was insufficient information available to satisfactorily determine the method of randomisation and the study data could not be verified. We have attempted to contact the study authors for more information, but so far, we have not been successful in doing this.