Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;2022(1):CD013345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013345.pub2

Yi 2015.

Methods Study design: Randomised clinical trial
Study duration: January 2009 to January 2011
Duration of follow‐up: 3 years
Setting: Hospital
Participants Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed as HCC by images; tumour number < 4; maximal tumour diameter ≤ 10 cm; Karnofsky score ≥ 70; with liver function of Child‐Pugh Class A or B
Exclusion criteria: With history of other tumours; with extrahepatic metastasis; with inferior vena cava or portal vein tumour thrombus
Age (mean ± SD): TACE + RFA: 52.14 ± 7.46 years; TACE alone: 51.98 ± 7.28 years
Male (n/total): TACE + RFA: 35/49; TACE alone: 35/48
Child‐Pugh Class (patients):
Class A: TACE + RFA: 32; TACE: 33
Class B: TACE + RFA: 17; TACE: 15
Interventions TACE + RFA group (n = 49):
TACE: Chemotherapeutic drugs: mitomycin and adriamycin
RFA: The interval between TACE and RFA was 2 weeks. 10‐15 minutes per RFA session, ablation margin of 1 cm
TACE group (n = 48): Chemotherapeutic drugs: mitomycin and adriamycin
Outcomes Tumour response, according to WHO criteria
Adverse events
1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates
Notes Country of study: China
Source of funding: None
There was insufficient information available to satisfactorily determine the method of randomisation and the study data could not be verified. We have attempted to contact the study authors for more information, but so far, we have not been successful in doing this.