Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;23(3):579–599. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09705-6

Table 1.

Selected studies evaluating the role of vitamin D status or vitamin D supplementation in patients with COVID-19

Author Study region Study design Study population Sample size (women/men) Age in years* Vitamin D status Results (RR, OR, or HR; 95% CI)
Observational studies
Ilie et al. [127] 20 European countries Ecological study Populations with data on mean 25(OH)D concentrations and COVID-19 NA NA 25(OH)D: 22.7 ± 4.2 ng/mL

Negative correlation between 25(OH)D concentrations and

• COVID-19 cases: r = –0.44 (P = 0.05)

• COVID-19 mortality: r = –0.44 (P = 0.05)

Meltzer et al. [7] USA Retrospective cohort study Individuals with 25(OH)D or 1,25(OH)2D concentrations 489 (366/123) 49.2 ± 18.4 Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL): 35% Increased risk of test ( +) for COVID-19 when vitamin D likely deficient vs likely sufficient (RR, 1.77; 1.12–2.81)
Kaufman et al. [6] USA Retrospective cohort study Individuals tested for COVID-19 with matching 25(OH)D results from the preceding 12 months 191,779 (130,473/61,306) 54.0 (40.4–64.7) Mean seasonally adjusted 25(OH)D: 31.7 ± 11.7 ng/mL

Association of vitamin D concentrations with SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates

• 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL (39,190 patients): 12.5%; 12.2%–12.8%

• 25(OH)D 30–34 ng/mL: 8.1%; 7.8%–8.4%

• 25(OH)D ≥ 55 ng/mL: 5.9%; 5.5%–6.4%

Merzon et al. [12] Israel Population-based retrospective study Individuals tested for COVID-19 with plasma 25(OH)D concentrations 7,807 (4,573/3,234) COVID-19 test ( +): 35.6 (34.5–36.7); (–): 47.4 (46.9–47.9) 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL: 13%; 25(OH)D 20–29 ng/mL: 72%

In patients with vitamin D < 30 ng/mL,

• Likelihood of COVID-19: aOR, 1.50; 1.13–1.98

• Likelihood of hospitalization for COVID-19: aOR, 1.95; 0.99–4.78

Radujkovic et al. [13] Germany Consecutive case series with prospectively collected data Hospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 185 (90/95) 60 (49–70) 25(OH)D: 16.6 (12.4–22.5) ng/mL Association of low vitamin D (< 12 ng/mL) with IMV and/or death (HR, 6.12; 2.79–13.42) and death (HR, 14.73; 4.16–52.19)
Jain et al. [56] India Prospective observational study (A) Asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 or (B) COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission 154 (69/95) (A) 42.3 ± 6.4; (B) 51.4 ± 9.1 (A) 25(OH)D: 27.9 ± 6.2 ng/mL; (B) 25(OH)D: 14.4 ± 5.8 ng/mL

Markedly low vitamin D concentrations in patients with severe COVID-19

In patients with vitamin D deficiency

• Higher levels of IL-6, ferritin, and TNF-α

• Higher fatality rate (21% vs 3%)

Hastie et al. [129] UK Retrospective study UK Biobank participants NA NA NA No association with 25(OH)D concentrations with severe COVID-19 or mortality
Hernandez et al. [151] Spain Retrospective case–control study Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 216 (86/130); 19 were on vitamin D supplementation Vitamin D supplementation ( +): 61.0 (47.5–70.0); (–): 60.0 (59.0–75.0) Vitamin D < 20 ng/mL: 82%

Higher prevalence of vitamin D < 20 ng/mL than population-based controls (82.2% vs 47.2%, P < 0.01)

25(OH)D concentrations

• Inverse correlation with ferritin (P = 0.01) and D-dimer levels (P = 0.03)

• No relationship with COVID-19 severity

Angelidi et al. [152] USA Retrospective cohort study Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 144 (80/64) 66 (55–74) 25(OH)D: 30.4 ± 17.0 ng/mL

Association with mortality

• 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL vs ≥ 30 ng/mL: 9.2% vs 25.3%, P = 0.02

• Association of increased vitamin D concentrations with in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.94; 0.90–0.98) and IMV (OR, 0.96; 0.93–0.99)

Abdollahi et al. [153] Iran Prospective case–control study Hospitalized patients tested (A) positive or (B) negative for COVID-19 402 (132/270)

(A) 48.0 ± 17.0; 

(B) 46.3 ± 13.5

(A) 25(OH)D: 24 (19–29) ng/mL; 

(B) 25(OH)D: 26 (21–35) ng/mL

Association of low vitamin D concentrations with COVID-19 infection (P = 0.02)
Reis et al. [131] Brazil Prospective cohort study Patients hospitalized for moderate-to-severe COVID-19 220 (103/117) 55.1 ± 14.6 25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL: 16 (7%); > 10 ng/mL: 204 (93%)

Hospital length of stay

• 25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL vs ≥ 10 ng/mL: 9.0 days vs 7.0 days, P = 0.057

• No association with IMV and mortality

Experimental studies
Castillo et al. [16] Spain Pilot RCT (intervention: high-dose oral calcifediol) Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 76 (31/45) 53 ± 10 NA

Intervention vs control

• Reduced requirements for ICU admission (P < 0.001)

Rastogi et al. [17] India RCT (intervention: 60,000 IU/day with therapeutic target of 25(OH)D > 50 ng/mL) Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients with 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL 40 (20/20) Intervention group: 50.0 (36.0–51.0); Control group: 47.5 (39.3–49.2) 25(OH)D: Intervention group 8.6 ng/mL; Control group 9.5 ng/mL*

Intervention vs control

• Higher negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (62.5% vs 20.8%; P < 0.02)

• A significant decrease in fibrinogen levels (difference: 0.70 ng/mL, P = 0.007)

Annweiler et al. [154] France Quasi-experimental study (intervention: bolus vitamin D administration) Frail elderly nursing-home residents with COVID-19 66 (15/51) 87.7 ± 9.0 NA

Intervention vs control

• Survival rate: 82.5% vs 44.4%, P = 0.023

• Mortality: aHR, 0.11; 0.03–0.48, P = 0.002

Annweiler et al. [121] France Quasi-experimental study: vitamin D supplementation (A) over the preceding year or (B) after COVID-19 diagnosis Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a geriatric unit 77 (38/39) 88 (85–92) NA

Survival at day 14

• (A) vs (B): 93.1% vs 81.2%, P = 0.33

• (A) vs control: 93.1% vs 68.7%, P = 0.02

Mortality for 14 days

• (A) vs control: aHR, 0.07; 0.01–0.61

• (B) vs control: aHR, 0.37; 0.06–2.21

Murai et al. [125] Brazil RCT (intervention: a single oral dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3) Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who were moderately to severely ill 237 (104/133) 56.2 ± 14.4 25(OH)D: 20.9 ± 9.2 ng/mL

Vitamin D3 vs placebo

• Length of hospital stay: 7.0 days vs 7.0 days

• In-hospital mortality: 7.6% vs 5.1%, P = 0.43

• ICU admission: 16.0% vs 21.2%, P = 0.30

• IMV: 7.6% vs 14.4%, P = 0.09

Lakkireddy et al. [155] India RCT (intervention: 60,000 IU/day of vitamin D) Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and vitamin D < 30 ng/mL 87 (22/65) 45 ± 13 Intervention group 16 ± 6 ng/mL; Control group: 17 ± 6 ng/mL

Inflammatory markers (CRP, LDH, IL-6, ferritin, N/L ratio)

• Significant reduction in the intervention group (P < 0.01) but not in the control group (P > 0.05) except CRP

Sánchez-Zuno et al. [122] Mexico RCT (intervention: 10,000 IU/day of vitamin D3) Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with COVID-19 42 (22/20) 43 (20–74) Vitamin D: 22.4 (12.1–45.9) ng/mL

• > 3 symptoms of COVID-19 vs control: 0% vs 4%, P = 0.04

• SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity vs control:

0% vs 5%, P = 0.47

• SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity vs. control: 72.7% vs 75.0%, P > 0.05

Mendelian randomization study
Butler-Laporte et al. [132] Two sample Mendelian randomization study Individuals of European ancestry GWAS of genetic variants associated with vitamin D concentrations: 443,734 (including 401,460 from the UK Biobank); GWAS of COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severe diseases: 1,299,010 (from the COVID-19 Host Genetic Initiative)

Genetically increased 25(OH)D concentrations by one SD (logarithmic scale)

• No association with COVID-19 susceptibility: OR, 0.95; 0.84–1.08

• No association with hospitalization for COVID-19: OR, 1.09; 0.89–1.33

• No association with severe COVID-19: OR, 0.97; 0.77–1.22

*(mean ± SD or overall range), 1,25(OH)2D 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D, aHR adjusted hazard ratio, aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, COVID-19 coronavirus disease 2019, CRP C-reactive protein, GWAS genome-wide association study, HR hazard ratio, ICU intensive care unit, IMV invasive mechanical ventilation, IL-6 interleukin-6, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, NA not applicable, N/L ratio neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, OR odds ratio, RCT randomized controlled trial, RR relative risk, SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SD standard deviation, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α