Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 21;11:792878. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.792878

Table 3.

Patient characteristics and clinical variables in patients with and patients without complications related to surgery (N = 231).

Variable No Complications (n = 121) TDN1 (1 to 5) (n = 110) p-value2
Age at surgery, mean (SD) 48.5 (14.5) 48.2 (14.6) 0.87
Female, n (%) 52 (43.0) 45 (40.9) 0.79
KPS3 at admission, median (Q1, Q3) 90 (70, 90) 90 (80, 90) 0.99
WHO 2016 classification, n (%)
 Oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 2 18 (14.9) 18 (16.4) 0.86
 Oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 3 17 (14.0) 16 (14.5) 1.00
 Diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 2 17 (14.0) 19 (17.3) 0.59
 Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 3 19 (15.7) 20 (18.2) 0.73
 Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 2 30 (24.8) 17 (15.5) 0.10
 Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 3 20 (16.5) 20 (18.2) 0.86
Epilepsy, n (%) 80 (66.1) 77 (70.0) 0.57
Neurological deficit at admission, n (%)
 Motor 19 (15.7) 9 (8.2) 0.11
 Cognitive 13 (10.7) 26 (23.6) 0.01
 Visual 8 (6.6) 4 (3.6) 0.38
 Language 11 (9.1) 17 (15.5) 0.16
Any neurological deficit excluding seizures 38 (31.4) 38 (34.5) 0.68
Type of neurosurgical intervention, n (%)
 Tumor resection 85 (70.2) 99 (90.0) <0.001
Main tumor location, n (%)
 Frontal 61 (50.4) 58 (52.7) 0.79
 Temporal 34 (28.1) 32 (29.1) 0.89
 Parietal 11 (9.1) 10 (9.1) 1.00
 Occipital 1 (0.8) 1 (0.9) 1.00
 Insular 11 (9.1) 7 (6.4) 0.47
 Basal ganglia 3 (2.5) 2 (1.8) 1.00
Tumor located in eloquent regions (UCSF4) 79 (65.3) 78 (71.6) 0.32
Tumor volume5, median (Q1, Q3) 55.1 (27.6, 133.5) 54.8 (28.1, 97.8) 0.60
Change in EQ-5L 3D index value, n (%) n = 18 n = 27
 MCID6 change in EQ-5D 3L index value - IMPROVED 5 (27.8) 4 (14.8) 0.45
 MCID change in EQ-5D 3L index value - UNCHANGED 10 (55.6) 18 (66.7) 0.54
 MCID change in EQ-5D 3L index value - WORSENED 3 (16.7) 5 (18.5) 1.00

1 Therapy-Disability-Neurology.

2 Statistical significance level was set to p < 0.05. All tests are 2 sided. Comparisons between groups were conducted with unpaired t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

3 Karnofsky Performance Status Scale.

4 University of California San Francisco classification system.

5 Volume in cubic millimeters. One missing case due to unavailable MRI.

6 Minimum clinical important difference.