Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2021 Apr 8;40(1):285–294. doi: 10.1002/jor.25029

TABLE 1.

Demographics between quadriceps strength groups

Variable Cohort RTS-HQ RTS-LQ P-value
n 27 13 (48%) 14 (52%) -
Biologic sexa, n (% female) 22 (82%) 9 (69%) 13 (93%) 0.11
Graft Typea, n (%) AL: 2 (7%)
HS: 18 (67%)
PT: 7 (26%)
AL: 1 (8%)
HS: 11 (85%)
PT: 1 (8%)
AL: 1 (7%)
HS: 7 (50%)
PT: 6 (43%)
0.11
Meniscus Injurya, n (%) 13 (48%) 7 (54%) 6 (43%) 0.57
At RTS b Age (years) 16.8 ± 2.3 16.7±3.0 16.9±1.6 0.79
Months from surgery to RTS 7.7 ± 2.3 8.4±2.9 7.1 ± 1.4 0.15
QF LSI (%) 87.9 ± 17.7 102.1 ± 12.2 74.6 ± 10.1 <0.001
At 5-year b Age (years) 22.0 ± 2.5 21.8±2.8 22.2±2.2 0.77
Months from RTS to 5-year 59.1 ± 6.6 59.6 ± 7.1 58.7 ± 6.3 0.73
QF LSI (%) 97.7 ± 11.2 96.3 ± 7.2 99.0 ± 14.1 0.59
Marx Activity Rating Scale
(0–16, most active)
10.5 ± 4.3 10.1 ± 3.5 10.9 ± 4.9 0.65

AL, allograft; HS, hamstring autograft; PT= patellar tendon-bone-tendon autograft; RTS, at the time of return to sport; QF LSI, quadriceps femoris limb symmetry index (0–100%, <100% indicates deficit on the involved limb)

a

Compared with Pearson Chi-Square test

b

Data reported as mean ± standard deviation