Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;12(1):1851078. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1851078

Table 4.

Moderator analyses of social support and military service characteristics

Moderator Neffects r 95% CI Q (df)
Social support type       4.07(2)
Perceived 31 −0.36 −0.43, −0.29  
Enacted 3 −0.23 −0.39, −0.07  
Structural 9 −0.26 −0.33, −0.19  
Social support source       8.27(1)***
Military 16 −0.24 −0.30, −0.18  
Non-military 32 −0.38 −0.45, −0.31  
Social Support Timing       4.76(1)***
During deployment 11 −.26 −.31, −.19  
Outside deployment 33 −.36 −.43, −.29  
NG/R Service       0.23(2)
Not NG/R 7 −0.24 −0.26, −0.21  
NG/R 8 −0.31 −0.34, −0.27  
Mixed Sample 13 −0.27 −0.30, −0.25  
Discharged       0.92(2)
Not discharged 14 −0.32 −0.39, −0.25  
Discharged 10 −0.38 −0.50, −0.25  
Mixed Sample 5 −0.37 −0.48, −0.25  
Deployment-era       14.14(2)***
Vietnam 3 −0.54 −0.64, −0.43  
Persian Gulf 3 −0.28 −0.40, −0.15  
OEF/OIF/OND 28 −0.30 −0.36, −0.24  

Note: NG/R = National Guard/Reserve. OEF/OIF/OND = Operational Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn.

For moderators in which different categories were represented within a single study, we used a shifting unit-of-analysis approach (Cooper, 2010).

*p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001