Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 19;53(1):2041–2049. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1999492

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients with pernicious placenta previa (PPP) and healthy controls.

Items Study group
p
Control (n = 46) PPP (n = 140)
Non-PA (n = 84) PA (n = 56)
Age (years) 28 (21, 35) 29 (22, 34) 30 (23, 37) .165
Gestational weeks at delivery        
 <37 4 (8.7 %) 40 (47.6%) 35 (62.5%) <.001
 ≥37 42 (91.3 %) 44 (52.4%) 21 (37.5%)  
Parity        
 0 22 (47.8 %) 9 (10.7%) 5 (8.9%) <.001
 1 17 (36.9 %) 39 (46.4%) 18 (32.2%)  
 ≥2 7 (15.3 %) 36 (42.9%) 33 (58.9%)  
History of abortions        
 0 31 (67.4 %) 41 (48.8%) 19 (33.9%) .013
 1 12 (26.1 %) 33 (39.3%) 25 (44.6%)  
 ≥2 3 (6.5 %) 10 (11.9%) 12 (21.5%)  
History of caesarean delivery        
 0 35 (76.1 %) 30 (35.7%) 16 (28.6%) <.001
 1 9 (19.6 %) 29 (34.5%) 14 (25.0%)  
 ≥2 2 (4.3 %) 25 (29.8%) 26 (46.4%)  
Type of PPP        
 Total placenta praevia   23 (27.4%) 34 (60.7%) <.001
 Partial placenta praevia   40 (47.6%) 14 (25.0%)  
 Marginal placenta praevia   21 (25.0%) 8 (14.3%)  
 Intraoperative haemorrhage (mL) 288 (134, 572) 664 (294, 1453) 1273 (487, 2518) <.001
 Hospitalization (days) 4 (3, 7) 6 (4, 9) 9 (6, 15) .027

The data presented are median (min., max.) or n (%). The comparisons of data among the three group were done by Kruskal–Wallis test or Chi-square test. PPP: pernicious placenta previa; PA: placenta accrete.