Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 11;32(8):083305. doi: 10.1063/5.0018432

TABLE II.

The various situations considered: (a) data for the distribution of micro-droplet diameters and sneezing initial velocity comparisons (θinj = 33° and mouth area = 314 mm2) and (b) comparison of injection angles and mouth areas for different cases.

Bin daverage (μm) dmin (μm) dmax (μm) ΔVInitial(ms−1) = 1 ms−1
(a)
Cases 1–8 90 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 9–16 140 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 17–24 190 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 26–32 240 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 33–40 290 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 41–48 340 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 49–56 390 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 57–64 440 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 65–72 490 40 980 6.3–14.3
Cases 73–80 540 40 980 6.3–14.3
Moutd area d average d min d max V Initial
Bin θ inj (mm2) (μm) (μm) (μm) (ms−1)
(b)
Cases 1–4 3°−43°(Δθinj = 10°) 314 290 40 980 8.3
Cases 5–8 33° 170, 314, 490, 700 90 40 980 14.3