TABLE 4.
Results of multinomial logistic regressions predicting interaction classes by demographicsa
| Class 2 vs. 1 | Class 3 vs. 1 | Class 4 vs. 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | p | OR | B (SE) | p | OR | B (SE) | p | OR | |
| Male vs. female | −0.001 (0.322) | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.133 (0.375) | 0.723 | 1.142 | 0.700 (0.533) | 0.189 | 2.014 |
| International vs. domestic | 0.607 (0.509) | 0.233 | 1.835 | 1.388 (0.660) | 0.035* | 4.006 | 1.824 (0.546) | 0.001** | 6.199 |
| Asian vs. white | 0.204 (0.506) | 0.687 | 1.226 | 0.379 (0.567) | 0.504 | 1.460 | 3.129 (0.934) | 0.001** | 22.843 |
| URM vs. white | −0.270 (0.331) | 0.414 | 0.763 | 0.222 (0.552) | 0.687 | 1.249 | 2.095 (0.988) | 0.034* | 8.124 |
| Asian vs. URM | 0.474 (0.537) | 0.377 | 1.607 | 0.156 (0.664) | 0.814 | 1.169 | 1.034 (0.679) | 0.128 | 2.812 |
| Class 3 vs. 2 | Class 4 vs. 2 | Class 4 vs. 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | p | OR | B (SE) | p | OR | B (SE) | p | OR | |
| Male vs. female | 0.134 (0.365) | 0.714 | 1.143 | 0.701 (0.522) | 0.180 | 2.016 | 0.567 (0.542) | 0.296 | 1.763 |
| International vs. domestic | 0.781 (0.570) | 0.171 | 2.183 | 1.217 (0.493) | 0.013* | 3.377 | 0.436 (0.542) | 0.421 | 1.547 |
| Asian vs. white | 0.175 (0.547) | 0.749 | 1.191 | 2.925 (0.866) | 0.001** | 18.632 | 2.750 (0.920) | 0.003** | 15.643 |
| URM vs. white | 0.493 (0.478) | 0.303 | 1.637 | 2.365 (0.837) | 0.005** | 10.647 | 1.872 (0.996) | 0.060 | 6.504 |
| Asian vs. URM | −0.318 (0.542) | 0.557 | 0.728 | 0.560 (0.486) | 0.250 | 1.750 | 0.878 (0.521) | 0.092 | 2.405 |
aOR, Odds ratio. Class 1: Faculty and Peer: Academic and Social/Personal; class 2: Peer Only: Academic and Social/Personal; class 3: Peer Only: Social/Personal; class 4: Faculty and Peer: Field-Related Academic; B, unstandardized coefficient; SE, standard error.
*p < 0.05.
**p < 0.01.