Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 5;49(6):1939–1950. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05666-9

Table 4.

Comparisons between post-COVID and de novo PD patients with hyposmia

Cluster extent Cluster level Cortical region Peak level Talairach coordinates cortical region BA
Corrected p value Maximum z-score
A Relative hypometabolism in post-COVID patients
781 0.012
R-frontal 6.5 32 2 36 Middle frontal gyrus 6
R-temporal 5.73 44 6  − 32 Medial temporal gyrus 21
R-temporal 5.68 44  − 24  − 8 Superior temporal gyrus 22
R-frontal 5.61 32 10 20 Insula 13
L-temporal 5.26  − 36  − 4  − 32 Middle temporal gyrus 21
L-temporal 5.22  − 34 4  − 20 Superior temporal gyrus 38
L-frontal 5.11  − 10 26  − 8 Middle frontal gyrus 11
B Relative hypometabolism in de novo PD patients
1964 0.002
R-occipital 8.4 38  − 92  − 2 Inferior occipital gyrus 18
R-occipital 8.33 8  − 102 10 Cuneus 18
L-occipital 8.25  − 10  − 90 36 Cuneus 19
L-occipital 8.22  − 34  − 86 6 Middles occipital gyrus 19

p < 0.05

FWE-corrected both at peak and cluster level were accepted as statistically significant. In the “cluster level” section on the left, the corrected p value and the brain lobe with hypometabolism are reported. In the “peak level” section on the right, the z-score and peak coordinates, the corresponding cortical region, and Brodmann area (BA) are reported

L, left; R, right