Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 30;10(14):34. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.14.34

Table 2.

Agreement Between Test–Retest Scans and Between Observed and Predicted (Converted) Values

Test vs. Retest Observed vs. Predicted
Protocol O Protocol O Validation Data CADME Data
No. of eyes 187 56 37
No. of measured pairs 187 187 112 112 150 150
CST, µm Spectralis Cirrus Spectralis Cirrus Spectralis Cirrus
 Mean (SD) 387 (112) 365 (115) 394 (135) 372 (140) 313 (81) 304 (80)
 Median (IQR) 365 (309, 435) 339 (284, 404) 347 (306, 434) 336 (283, 400) 296 (252, 356) 288 (243, 346)
Compared with CST, µm Retest Spectralis Retest Cirrus Predicted Spectralisa Predicted Cirrusb Predicted Spectralisa Predicted Cirrusb
 Mean (SD) 385 (110) 365 (112) 393 (132) 372 (126) 329 (76) 296 (76)
 Median (IQR) 362 (306, 429) 340 (286, 406) 359 (308, 419) 328 (289, 409) 313 (271, 368) 280 (239, 336)
Absolute difference, µm, %c
 Min 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0% 0, 0%
 5th percentile 0, 0% 0, 0% 2, 0% 1, 0% 3, 1% 1, 0%
 10th percentile 1, 0% 1, 0% 2, 1% 2, 1% 5, 1% 2, 1%
 25th percentile 2, 0% 1, 0% 6, 2% 4, 1% 11, 3% 4, 2%
 Mean 10, 3% 7, 2% 21, 5% 21, 6% 16, 6% 9, 3%
 Median 4, 1% 3, 1% 13, 4% 9, 3% 17, 6% 7, 3%
 75th percentile 12, 3% 6, 2% 20, 6% 23, 6% 21, 8% 11, 3%
 90th percentile 24, 6% 14, 4% 48, 10% 45, 12% 25, 10% 16, 5%
 95th percentile 35, 10% 32, 6% 83, 18% 81, 18% 27, 12% 27, 7%
 Max 87, 32% 115, 40% 183, 49% 193, 62% 65, 26% 53, 18%
Difference, µm, %c
 Min −65, −19% −57, −19% −143, −35% −193, −35% −16, −2% −53, −18%
 5th percentile −22, −6% −12, −3% −58, −16% −45, −10% −0, −0% −27, −7%
 10th percentile −12, −3% −8, −2% −37, −8% −27, −5% 4, 1% −16, −5%
 25th percentile −3, −1% −4, −1% −9, −2% −9, −3% 10, 3% −11, −3%
 Mean 2, 0% 1, 0% −1, 0% −1, 1% 15, 6% −8, −3%
 Median 0, 0% −1, −0% 4, 1% −2, −1% 17, 6% −7, −2%
 75th percentile 5, 1% 2, 1% 14, 4% 8, 3% 21, 8% −3, −1%
 90th percentile 18, 4% 8, 3% 20, 6% 32, 9% 25, 10% 1, 0%
 95th percentile 29, 7% 19, 4% 33, 8% 60, 18% 27, 12% 2, 1%
 Max 87, 32% 115, 40% 183, 49% 148, 62% 65, 26% 9, 5%
LOA d for micron differences, µm
 95% LOA (−34, 34) (−28, 28) (−69, 69) (−73, 73) (−3, 33) (−28, 10)
 [95% confidence interval] [(−39, −30), (30, 39)] [(−32, −25), (25, 32)] [(−86, −56), (56, 86)] [(−92, −59), (59, 92)] [(−7, 0), (30, 37)] [(−32, −24), (7, 15)]
 Within eye ICC NA NA 0.79 0.82 0.42 0.23
LOA d for relative differences, %c
 95% LOA (−10%, 10%) (−8%, 8%) (−17%, 17%) (−22%, 22%) (−2%, 12%) (−8%, 3%)
 [95% confidence interval] [(−11%, −8%), (8%, 11%)] [(−10%, −7%), (7%, 10%)] [(−21%, −14%), (14%, 21%)] [(−28%, −18%), (18%, 28%)] [(−4%, −0%), (11%, 14%)] [(−9%, −7%), (2%, 4%)]
 Within eye ICC NA NA 0.72 0.84 0.56 0.15
a

Predicted Spectralis = 40.78 + 0.95 × Cirrus.

b

Predicted Cirrus = 1.82 + 0.94 × Spectralis.

c

Percent differences for test-retest comparisons were relative to the test–rest mean and percent differences between predicted and observed values were relative to the observed values. The latter were calculated as percent difference = [(predicted – observed value)/observed value]*100%.

d

LOA between test versus retest and observed versus predicted values in Protocol O were centered around zero (expected mean difference) whereas the LOAs between observed versus predicted values in the CADME data were centered around the sample mean differences.

ICC, intraclass correlation; NA, not available.