Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 1;50(D1):D236–D245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1089

Table 3.

Partial comparison of the proportion and detailed classification of detected repeats generated based on two databases of the Drosophila genome

Combination of RepBase and Dfam [bases masked: 20.85%] msRepDB [bases masked: 21.86%]
Repeat types Number of elements Length occupied Percentage of sequences Number of elements Length occupied Percentage of sequences
Retroelements 15 330 21 048 835 bp 14.65% 23 186 22 483 014 bp 15.64%
+SINEs 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+Penelope 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+LINEs 5293 5 447 560 bp 4.49% 6134 6 416 652 bp 4.46%
++CRE/SLACS 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+++L2/CR1/Rex 811 844 019 bp 0.59% 870 841 783 bp 0.59%
+++R1/LOA/Jockey 1014 1 562 240 bp 1.09% 1571 1 694 722 bp 1.18%
+++R2/R4/NeSL 38 39 896 bp 0.03% 38 39 900 bp 0.03%
+++RTE/Bov-B 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+++L1/CIN4 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+LTR elements 10 037 14 601 275 bp 10.16% 16 914 16 066 362 bp 11.18%
++BEL/Pao 2326 3 123 105 bp 2.17% 2937 3 118 973 bp 2.17%
++Tyl/Copia 500 740 782 bp 0.52% 784 733 449 bp 0.51%
++Gypsy/DTRS1 7211 10 737 388 bp 7.47% 13 243 12 190 939 bp 8.48%
+++Retroviral 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
DNA transposons 4135 1 870 086 bp 1.30% 4494 1 824 527 bp 1.27%
+hobo-Activator 189 75 919 bp 0.05% 168 76 244 bp 0.05%
+Tc1-IS630-Pogo 1112 609 344 bp 0.42% 1108 560 858 bp 0.39%
+En-Spm 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+MuDR-IS905 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+PiggyBac 23 8619 bp 0.01% 23 8617 bp 0.01%
+Tourist/Harbinger 0 0 bp 0.00% 0 0 bp 0.00%
+Other 2243 913 674 bp 0.64% 2454 894 197 bp 0.62%
Rolling circles 4662 999 082 bp 0.70% 5232 1 028 233 bp 0.72%
Unclassified 495 78 825 bp 0.05% 534 121 856 bp 0.08%
Total interspersed repeats 22 997 746 bp 16.00% 24 429 397 bp 17.00%
Small RNA 306 86 258 bp 0.06% 280 95 863 bp 0.07%
Satellites 1372 1 804 199 bp 1.26% 1828 1 862 670 bp 1.30%
Simple repeats 85 083 3 589 418 bp 2.50% 83 836 3 525 845 bp 2.45%
Low complexity 10 443 488 602 bp 0.34% 10 322 482 327 bp 0.34%

The test results were obtained by using RepeatMasker based on the msRepDB database and the combination of Dfam and RepBase respectively under the default parameter settings.